Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26ccc539eab1528

Jump to content

Talk:Angels in Islam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Arief Azazie Zain in topic Need correction

Odd inclusion in "see also"

[edit]

There are three things in "see also", one of which is "Sariel". Though looking at that article identifies him as an angel, that article mainly talks about him in Jewish tradition, and makes no reference to Islam. Thus it doesn't seem to be of much relevance to this article, unless there are some major things missing from that article.--68.92.95.219 (talk) 07:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I also wondered why Sariel is mentioned here. Maybe someone else knows the relationship to Islam. If not, I think it should be removed indeed.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 14:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I would say remove. Specific names of angels should not be listed when List of theological angels is linked. Radhamadhab Sarangi (Talk2Me|Contribs) 16:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Removed "Sariel" per above discussion. Radhamadhab Sarangi (Talk2Me|Contribs) 17:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I think this article has too much wrong informations, first of all what are these photos? These aren't existing in Islam, according to Islam, we don't know the view of the angels, we just know that they are helping the only god ALLAH and they are created by the light. Don't let everyone to write a article about religions, please.
91.63.227.71 (talk) 08:29, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Individual Angels

[edit]

I have a question regarding the list of angels: The list mentions the Cherubim and Seraphim (those around the throne), and the archangels respectively. However, the archangels and the "angels around the throne" are usually considered to be of the same order (muqaribiyun). Would it make sense to move them up the the Archangel-Section above or to give a briad introduction into "God's Near Angels" (which are basically the Islamic coutnerpart of "Archangels") or should we just leave it that way until better sources are available? VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invalid revert

[edit]

@Simple non combat the recent removal of concent are supported by the guidlines mentioned in the edit-summary. I want to point out that you have failed to provide any of them in your revert of my removal. In good faith I want to kindly remind you to legimate your reverts.

If you have questions regarding those reverts, you can use section for discussion. VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 02:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Need correction

[edit]

Is the "Muhammad meets the angel with seventy heads" picture contains Muhammad's face??? In Islam, Muhammad's face was not shown usually because of reasons. It is forbidden to draw anything on Muhammad's face.

Can you please remove or change the picture regarding to the reasons? CMIIW Arief Azazie Zain (talk) 10:18, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also, there's another picture showing Muhammad's face in "Muhammad requests Maalik to show him Hell during his heavenly journey" and "Muhammad and the Angel Gabriel by Abd al-Razzak"? It's better to censor his face with white like in the picture "1543 illustration of the Miraj" and "A 16th century Siyer-i Nebi image of Angel Gabriel visiting Muhammad"
For more info please check this article: Depictions of Muhammad Arief Azazie Zain (talk) 10:25, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Um yes... also all of the prophet's faces should be censored because yeah, it's also forbidden for some reasons. Arief Azazie Zain (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply