Talk:Ananda Lewis

unreferenced material

Unreferenced material has been removed. Please properly reference anything that is readded.--Rtphokie (talk) 22:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ananda Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080908084837/http://www.hwwilson.com/currentbio/cover_bios/cover_bio_6_05.htm to http://www.hwwilson.com/currentbio/cover_bios/cover_bio_6_05.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference removal

Pinging: @HumanWritesBook

Is there a reason for mass-removing citations throughout the article? Now it appears that the article is heavily unreferenced. The "Later career" and "Personal life" section are now fully unsourced, and the "Early career" section only has one source. There is nothing wrong with using multiple sources in different places. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 23:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

@GalacticVelocity08 Thank you for your participation! Please note that the references that have been omitted were the ones used multiple times ... from what I recall in detail, reference #9 (which the system counted as being noted up to 12 times throughout the article, which is redundant and unnecessary, is now noted once in the reference list) and reference #10 (which the system counted as being noted up to 9 times throughout the article, which is redundant and unnecessary, is now noted once in the reference list). there is more than enough credible sourced material available about the subject to proceed with addressing the need of additional supporting evidence material references throughout the article ... this is something that I, for one, hold the clear intent on participating in the action of editorial clean-up, adding additional noteworthy details in addition to the expansion of references list, for the record. HumanWritesBook (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

@HumanWritesBook You can use a reference multiple times in Wikipedia. Deleting a citation/reference that supports a statement to leave it unsourced detracts from the article. Golan1911 (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Golan1911 thanks! When it comes to a point where a references is noted up to 12-times, I respectfully disagree. Especially in this case where just two articles -- one of which was sources back to a "wayBack" archieve -- ehen there are multiple main stream news artilces that can be referenced herein. That stated, would you like to team up with me to go through the artilce rather than spending time going back and forth over ego???? HumanWritesBook (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Reversed false statement

I reversed a recent edit that made it seem as though she was still alive when she wasn't. 2601:19E:4489:5320:9076:6998:CAA2:F1E2 (talk) 22:20, 15 October 2025 (UTC)