Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27e1684499c98f1

Jump to content

Talk:A House of Dynamite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Trypoxylon in topic Plausibility of the scenario

Nuclear War by Annie Jacobsen

[edit]

Isn’t that just a dramatized version of that book? Why no reference to the book? 70.29.178.26 (talk) 14:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The film’s plot has some similarities with the scenario in the book, but also important differences. Jacobsen’s book may have gotten a lot of attention, but it is hardly the first to present a nuclear-war scenario, so it would be unfair to cite just this one book. Gmusser (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Other films about nuclear war

[edit]

On the aftermath: Threads (1984 film), The Day After, On The Beach (1959 film)

On decision making: Fail Safe (1964 film)

From the Soviet Union: Dead Man's Letters KHarbaugh (talk) 12:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Page vandalism

[edit]

The top of the page is being targeted with vandalism.

Plot synopsis

[edit]

"Baker commits suicide upon realizing he wouldn't be able to save his daughter in time."

That's not my read at all. Or at least it's a massive over-simplification. He seems resigned to the fact she cannot be saved and he's happy she won't die alone. At the point he kills himself, the president is looking for his opinion on retaliation. My read (of Reid) is that with little left to live for he'd simply rather die than confront his (extremely grim) responsibilities. --AnsIdgag (talk) 08:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sam Nunn

[edit]

Should we add the fact that former senator Sam Nunn (in connection with his Nuclear Threat Initiative) served as an advisor for this film? ~2025-31208-44 (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Captions

[edit]

Should we add a mention of the captions/headings/titles that appear at the start of the film's three sections? ~2025-31208-44 (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Plausibility of the scenario

[edit]

Should we add a section on whether the plot is realistic? Among other problems, the film gives short shrift to most likely outcome of such an incident: a Second strike, i.e. absorbing the initial attack and determining the responsible party before retaliating. Gmusser (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Agreed; I added some stuff to the technical criticism section on this. Trypoxylon (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Plot

[edit]

Someone replaced a 700-word plot synopsis with a 2176-word one based on the (false) argument that the former was AI-made. 2176 words for a film that is less than two hours long and consists of the same 20-minute plot repeated three times is not optimal by any stretch of the imagination. AnyDosMilVint (talk) 12:39, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply