Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a285c4258f1ae6b0

Jump to content

Talk:91st Academy Awards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jgwilliams873 in topic Multiple Awards/Nominations Tables
Featured list91st Academy Awards is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2009Articles for deletionDeleted
February 12, 2018Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
December 28, 2020Featured list candidatePromoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 25, 2019.
Current status: Featured list

nominations

[edit]

um why are some of the nominations bolded? pretty sure the winners have NOT been announced yet. I have changed the nominations to reflect this RoboBongoCuckooCop (talk)

why are winners double marked?

[edit]

it states: Winners are listed first, highlighted in boldface, and indicated with a double dagger ()

  • why? is bold not enough? who is able to see the small () at the end of a bold line?
  • what is the benefit of it?
  • (I would remove the double dagger)

thanks for reasons, -- 178.239.74.16 (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

You make a good point. I am not 100% sure, but I think this has something to do with Wikipedia's "rules" for "accessibility". In other words, some readers have difficulty seeing. So, we can't just use different colors to differentiate winners from nominees. So, they typically include some sort of symbol. In this case, the double dagger. I believe this is the reasoning behind it. To comply with the Wikipedia rules for accessibility by all readers. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:10, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Here are all the details: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility. And, here are some more: Wikipedia:Accessibility dos and don'ts. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Okay looks likes the winners have pages, but...

[edit]

Some are just redirects to the films, like for example the sound editors of Bohemian Rhapsody are just redirects. I think someone probably should turn those into pages sometime. (I'm looking up who has yet to have pages go up, someone mentioned the film editor of Green Book earlier, yes I'm aware that is not a winner but there are some noms without pages.) Wgolf (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Multiple Awards/Nominations Tables

[edit]

Can someone please add tables with films that won multiple awards and nominations? If you need assistance getting the list started, Bohemian Rhapsody had the most wins, while Roma and The Favourite shared the most nominations. Jgwilliams873 (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply