Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a227008d4f8bdbb4

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did isotypical representation say? "I'm a type above the rest.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In group theory, an isotypical, primary or factor representation[1] of a group G is a unitary representation such that any two subrepresentations have equivalent sub-subrepresentations.[2] This is related to the notion of a primary or factor representation of a C*-algebra, or to the factor for a von Neumann algebra: the representation of G is isotypical iff is a factor.

This term more generally used in the context of semisimple modules.

Property

[edit]

One of the interesting property of this notion lies in the fact that two isotypical representations are either quasi-equivalent or disjoint (in analogy with the fact that irreducible representations are either unitarily equivalent or disjoint).

This can be understood through the correspondence between factor representations and minimal central projection (in a von Neumann algebra).[3] Two minimal central projections are then either equal or orthogonal.

Example

[edit]

Let G be a compact group. A corollary of the Peter–Weyl theorem has that any unitary representation on a separable Hilbert space is a possibly infinite direct sum of finite dimensional irreducible representations. An isotypical representation is any direct sum of equivalent irreducible representations that appear (typically multiple times) in .

References

[edit]
  1. Deitmar & Echterhoff 2014, § 8.3 p.162
  2. Higson, Nigel; Roe, John. "Operator Algebras" (PDF). psu.edu. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  3. Dixmier 1982, Prop. 5.2.7 p.117

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]