Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements
Add topic| Main talk | Templates RELC | Articles RELC Stats | Periodic Table by Quality By importance | Pictures | Isotopes | Periodic Table Graphics (PTG) | Participants WikiChem IRC | Links |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Redirects for discussion
- 26 Sep 2026 – G-block (talk · edit · hist) →Extended periodic table RfDed by Kepler-1229b (t · c) was closed; see discussion
Featured article candidates
- 27 Sep 2026 – Praseodymium (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); see discussion
Good article nominees
- 25 Sep 2026 – Ytterbium compounds (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); start discussion
- 24 Sep 2026 – Neodymium (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Sep 2026 – Lanthanum compounds (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); start discussion
- 20 Sep 2026 – Samarium compounds (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); start discussion
- 20 Sep 2026 – Praseodymium compounds (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); start discussion
- 19 Sep 2026 – Erbium compounds (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); start discussion
- 15 Sep 2026 – Niobium compounds (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Praseodymium-141 (t · c); start discussion
Requested moves
- 23 Sep 2026 – Natural abundance (talk · edit · hist) move request to Isotopic abundance by Johnjbarton (t · c) was moved to Isotopic abundance (talk · edit · hist); see discussion
Click to watch (Subscribe via
| B | C | Start | Stub | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? | Total | ||||
| 29 | 0 | 94 | 107 | 135 | 92 | 30 | 0 | 170 | 318 | 0 | 0 | 115 | 1 | 22 | 8,919 | 228 | 0 | 0 | 10,260 |
Sg — atomic weight?
[edit]The Periodic table article with the big table and the Seaborgium article disagree. ~2026-42620-64 (talk) 08:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- It's either 267 of 269. There is a footnote explaining the reason its atomic weight is unclear at Seaborgium. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Why is the half-life of 269Sg listed as 13 minutes in the isotope table but as 5 ± 2 minutes in the footnote there?
- UnbihexiumFan (talk | contribs) 14:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- User:248Cm-Target changed it in June 2025 based on a powerpoint presentation that tangentially had a diagram of superheavy element half-lives (and it didn't even match the reference then). -- Reconrabbit (talk) 14:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
"Aluminium is at peer review."
[edit]But it isn't? The announcements section hasn't been updated in quite some time. ~2026-43824-63 (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Tungsten
[edit]Also called "wolfram" in the lead? How common is this name? We don't mention natrium except as where the symbol comes from and perhaps in the history section. ~2026-43824-63 (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- Replied on Talk:Tungsten#Wolfram Johnjbarton (talk) 13:58, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
Move proposal: Natural abundance -> Isotopic abundance
[edit]Please join the discussion on Talk:Natural_abundance#Requested_move_23_September_2026 Johnjbarton (talk) 03:40, 29 September 2026 (UTC)