Draft talk:Virtual Population
Add topic| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WP:Three best sources
[edit]Ref. 3: "Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: the Virtual Population 3.0". Physics in Medicine & Biology. 59 (18): 5287. 21 August 2014 – via IOP SCIENCE. Ref. 5: "The Virtual Family: A set of anatomically correct whole-body computational models". https://cdrh-rst.fda.gov/virtual-family-set-anatomically-correct-whole-body-computational-models. Ref. 6: "From Image-Based Modeling to the Modeling of Imaging with the Virtual Population". Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 45–54. 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46630-9_5. ISBN 978-3-319-46630-9 – via Springer Nature Link.
Paid connected contributor
[edit]I am a semi-retired employee of the IT'IS Foundation in Zurich, Switzerland. I am paid on an hourly basis to write and edit articles about the foundation and SME partners SPEAG, ZMT, and TI Solutions, as well as about the founder Prof. Niels Kuster. GoneDutch (talk) 15:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Using AI to improve text
[edit]I used ChatGPT to edit the text paragraph by paragraph with the prompt "please edit this text for compliance with wikipedia guidelines to appear to be independent and to reduce self promotion" GoneDutch (talk) 13:42, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Images
[edit]I have requested images to add to the article GoneDutch (talk) 13:43, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply to comment of WeirdNAnnoyed
[edit]Dear WeirdNAnnoyed,
Thanks very much for your quick review of the draft article about the Virtual Population. I had not expected that it would be reviewed so soon and thought that I would have time to edit and add more references. I would like to add images, but for that I need to acquire the images and the permission to use them.
I however take issue with: Comment: No solid evidence this particular computational model is notable. The sources are all discussing various research projects or applications of Virtual Population, not Virtual Population itself. Secondary coverage of the subject itself is needed.
References 2 and 4 are peer-reviewed scientific papers published in Physics in Biology and Medicine that describe the development of the first 4 Virtual Family models and several of the remaining models that make up the Virtual Population whole-body computational phantoms. Reference 7 is another peer-reviewed article published in PLoS ONE that describes the development of the MIDA head model. References 3 and 8 are US FDA web pages about the Virtual Family and MIDA. Reference 6 is to a book chapter published about the development of the morphing functionality.
I will post this reply to WeirdNAnnoyed's comment on the talk pages of both WeirdNAnnoyed's and my user pages. GoneDutch (talk) 10:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Updated four best sources
[edit]Three of the original "Four best sources" have been replaced with sources independent of the IT'IS Foundation and partners -- webpages from the U.S. FDA and Imperial College London.
- Draft-Class Biology pages
- NA-importance Biology pages
- WikiProject Biology articles
- Draft-Class Switzerland pages
- NA-importance Switzerland pages
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages
- Draft-Class Engineering pages
- NA-importance Engineering pages
- WikiProject Engineering articles
- Draft-Class Computer science pages
- NA-importance Computer science pages
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Draft-Class Computing pages
- NA-importance Computing pages
- All Computing articles