Draft talk:Aircall
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Trentonrerker in topic How to improve sources
| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How to improve sources
[edit]Hello, which sources specifically are substandard? @MSK @JSFarman Trenton Erker (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Trenton Erker.
- The key issue is that references need to provide extensive coverage via independent, reliable sources. Les Echo is great and Tech Crunch is OK.
- Otherwise, press releases (Yahoo), articles that include advertising disclosures (Forbes, Business News Daily) and articles based on company-provided materials are not independent. (Business Insider and funding pieces.) Geekwire is generally reliable, but the article is about an office opening; the company is only briefly covered. Forward Media appears to be sponsored content. (There's no byline, and the publication is operated by a marketing company.) One of the Forbes refs does not mention Aircall.
- Give the articles about reliable and independent sources a read for more information. IMO, for a company, you will need at least five references that meet the criteria to establish notability. JSFarman (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- Dang. This was really helpful. Thank you for working with me on this. Trenton Erker (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Draft-Class company pages
- NA-importance company pages
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Draft-Class software pages
- NA-importance software pages
- Draft-Class Computing pages
- NA-importance Computing pages
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- NA-Class Telecommunications pages
- NA-importance Telecommunications pages
- Draft-Class Internet pages
- NA-importance Internet pages
- WikiProject Internet articles
