Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
Latest comment: 19 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
When I expand the entry "WikiProject Dogs", I get:
[–] WikiProject Dogs
304 undefined:
[+] Dogs articles by importance
[+] Dogs articles by quality
[+] WikiProject Dogs
[+] WikiProject Dogs Members
with the "304" and all the "[+]" in red. I thought Categories weren't supposed to self-reference themselves? How do we go about fixing this? Gordon | Talk, 14:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'm afraid I'm not really sure what the question is. The WikiProject Dogs page mentioned in the category is the Project page, not the category page. Also, categories of this type are fairly common for most of the larger projects. I think I actually took the design from Wikipedia:WikiProject Virginia, so I thought that it was fairly reasonably formed. It isn't technically self-referencing, because the category of WPDogs is not itself a member of the category. I think. If my answer is insufficient, or if I somehow misconstrued the question, please let me know. Badbilltucker17:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks mate. It looks good now, the organisation is nifty. Alas, I come across quite a lot of Cat pages with the 304 and [+] all in red. Gordon | Talk, 13:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}