Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a71f110fe826b9

Jump to content

Category talk:Muslim apologists

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is a Muslim apologists?

[edit]

What is a Muslim apologist how can you have a cat without even knowing what it means?--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Highly subjective term which could be used for anyone who advocates Islam using rational explanations. It also sounds pretty negative.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 20:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delete

[edit]

I saw this discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_1#Category:Muslim_apologists. Timtempleton and Carlossuarez46, should this along with sibling categories be listed again for deletion as Marcocapelle suggested? Both of you seem to have agreed that all should go.VR talk 12:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Vice regent: agreed - it seems to be a loaded category. Muslims have nothing to apologize for, any more than followers of any other religions. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 14:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Would you like to nominate all such categories for deletion? I'd do it except I've not done this before.VR talk 15:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Islamic apologetics vs apologist for Islam or Muslims

[edit]

Timtempleton I saw this edit. That link you added (Apologetics#Islam) refers to Islamic apologetics, where Islamic doctrines and theology is being defended, and Islam is being promoted as the true religion. It is analogous to Christian apologetics. Hence most people in this category are also Islamic missionaries of sorts, like [Zakir Naik]] and Ahmed Deedat.

But now we have a debate here (Talk:John_Esposito#Incorrect_removal_of_Category:Muslim_apologists) on whether Esposito is an apologist. Esposito is not an Islamic missionary and is not defending Islam as the true religion. However, he still defends Islam and the Muslim world in a political way. There are tonnes of scholars who have done that, including Edward Said, Reza Aslan etc. Should he be in the same category as the missionary apologists above? VR talk 02:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Also pinging @Thincat: @Drmies: @Johnpacklambert: @Peterkingiron: who made comments over what this category constitutes at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_August_22#Category:Muslim_apologists.VR talk 02:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Vice regent For once I kind of agree with you. I thought something similar when I saw this category. In my opinion who defend the Islamic religion should be categorized as "Islam apologist" (new Wikipedia category), while who defend Muslims, as humans that happen to have a particular religion, should be categorized as "Muslim apologist". Grufo (talk) 03:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Adding to this cleanup, as an FYI, I proposed merging and renaming these as Apologetics versus Apologists. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_11#Category:Religious_apologists. I saw adding Apologetics#Islam to the lead for the Apologist category as a compromise. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 20:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply