Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to Brazil. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Brazil|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Brazil. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to South America.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Brazil

Taurino Araújo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails to meet WP:NACADEMIC and the edit history of the author suggests a WP:COI. There are no awards, memberships or fellowships. The subject of the article also appears to be a practicing criminal law attorney, which is not mentioned so this may be a form of covert advertising. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 17:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Literature, Poetry, Law, and Brazil. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 17:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Delete per nomination. Does not make NACADEMIC. Khalitate (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Candice Pascoal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are mainly about the company not the person. Fails WP:GNG WP:ANYBIO. - The9Man ^Talk 08:04, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, Brazil, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Delete - The tone appears to be pure advertising & fails GNG Brodska213 (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Pablo (footballer, born March 1991)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to say about this football player other than his name, age, physical attributes, and outcomes of games that he played in. Should be deleted, as Wikipedia is not a database. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and Football. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep – Full of coverage: , , , , more than 100 apps in Brazilian Série B and Série C. Svartner (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete. Sources identified above are utterly routine transfer announcements with no more than three press release-based sentences of secondary coverage (first two sources), a non-independent profile from a club (third), and a database-style listicle that doesn't have a single sentence on him (fourth)! JoelleJay (talk) 14:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:09, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Dayse Oliveira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same situation than Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertz Dias. I also suggest a redirection to United Socialist Workers' Party. Svartner (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect per nom. The logic of redirecting as per the outcome for Hertz Dias makes sense here, too. PA Uploader (talk) 00:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect. From a quick search, nothing notable about her yet for a standalone article. MichealKal (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect as suggested, and as reasonable in these circumstances. We frequently redirect political candidates' articles. Bearian (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the article's undeletion for any reason. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Instrodi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no references on this article. Could not find any more sources on Instrodi and sources I could find on its parent organization, STRO, seem to not contribute to notability. Both likely fail WP:NCORP. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Economics, and Brazil. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Flecheiras

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to be a WP:HOAX. The pages content is literally IDENTICAL to Emboaca and Barra Grande except for the place names, and extremely similar to Mundaú, which were pretty much the page creator's only contributions to Wikipedia besides creating a possibly existent town article called Guajiru. Looking at the user contributions pages histories, except for Guajiru, all seem to be unsourced entirely and only bot and simple/auto edits have been made in the entire page lifespans. I suspect with the exception of Guajiru (but possibly also it too) all of them are hoaxes and should be moved to WP:HOAXLIST. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 01:37, 21 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Brazil. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:23, 21 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete – A quick search turned up only booking sites and an Instagram page for the place, but no official sources or news coverage to justify an article. Svartner (talk) 18:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep per WP:NGEO, the hoax claims are out of place here as the village exists and that's verifiable, it's just a matter of cleanup (which I have started to perform) and expansion. Several things in the article are also correct and verifiable, eg. being a fishing village can be easily sourced, eg. Lonely Planet Brazil guide calls it "fishing village" and this book has a whole chapter about the village (Turismo e Emprego em Flecheiras) and spends at least a paragraph about its fishing activities. Side note, the book reports a population of 3,070 as of 2002, which is a significant figure. This other book also talks about its fishing activities and mentions its tourism development. I see enough sources in Google Books (even if most of them only show snippets) for a decent article. Cavarrone 05:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:43, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Keep per Cavarrone - real place, discussed in Lonely Planet. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Brazil Proposed deletions

Dino Aventuras (via WP:PROD on 20 September 2025)