Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ilyazamani12

Ilyazamani12

Ilyazamani12 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ilyazamani12/Archive.

12 August 2026

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Azeri009 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

1. They are adding the Simko Shikak revolt (1918-1922) to the infobox in the article. ‎
2. The user is particularly interested in Georgian and Soviet commanders and add conflicts to infoboxes.
3. Ilyazamani12 generally uses nationalist-sounding names; in fact, they had used at least three other nicknames very similar to the current one. Azerbaijani09 (talk · contribs), User:Azerbaijani ilya (talk · contribs), Iranian azerbaijani (talk · contribs) ("Azeri" and "Azerbaijani" are the same thing).
4. When I asked them whether this account was linked to Ilyazamani12, they didn't answer and continued editing. — Kajmer05 (talk) 15:02, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

   CU results have come up as 'possible' many times before. They specifically target Georgian, Soviet, and Iranian commanders these are truly niche topics. In particular, the username of one of the blocked accounts I cited as evidence bears a striking resemblance, (Azerbaijani09) yet they haven't even replied when I asked if there was a connection to Ilyazamani12. Kajmer05 (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk – particularly per 1 and 3 in the filing: the username is similar down to the number. Requesting CheckUser to ensure a connection. Staraction (talk · contribs) 16:35, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
• I also came across Idkanthing (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) whose only edit is similar to one made by Azeri009 a week later. Perhaps not enough to justify checking for now, but maybe worth keeping an eye on. Staraction (talk · contribs) 16:35, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
•  The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says: "I wish I had better comparison data". Azeri009 is certainly  Possible to historical data. They also have a confirmed zero-edit sleeper – Staraction, if you end up blocking, please give me a ping and I'll block and report that one. Idkanthing did not show up in my check, and I did not check them independently. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

---