Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
| Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here – discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header (dark green when in dark mode) appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary[edit]
All articles featured in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps[edit]
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers[edit]
Voicing an opinion on an item[edit]Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...[edit]
Please do not...[edit]
Suggesting updates[edit]There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Structure
[edit]This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived.
To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.
August 8
[edit]|
August 8, 2026 (Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
|
August 7
[edit]|
August 7, 2026 (Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
Viruses generated by AI
[edit]Blurb: The AI Evo is used to systematically design and generate viable bacteriophage genomes for the first time. (Post)Credits:
- Created and nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: There's widespread coverage of this breakthrough in which a genomic AI was used to design viruses which were then created and tested. I didn't find a suitable article initially and so have created one. Note also that the US government issued a "New U.S. Government Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research" last week... Andrew🐉(talk) 22:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not again.... I don't think any of the trivial science factoid deserve a blurb. NotKringe (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not always a fan of Andrew's noms, but this seems interesting. Just not sure if it meets ITNSIGNIF. Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose, new medical treatments are researched daily, but until they pass regulatory review and approval it's just hype for a particular set of models. Stephen 01:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose, firstly blurb is wrong. The AI did not generate viable viruses, it made the code and researchers then generated the viruses from this code. Secondly, this is not new, Artificial gene synthesis has been around for a couple of decades. CMD (talk) 07:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've tweaked the blurb to address your first point. On the second point, the breakthrough here is that the AI generates complete genomes not just a gene. All the coverage seems to say that this is new. For example, the NYT article starts
For the first time, scientists have used artificial intelligence to create new kinds of viruses, raising hopes for medical advances while also raising the disturbing possibility that the technology could someday be used to invent dangerous pathogens.
The BBC saysIt is the first time whole genomes have been successfully designed by AI.
Andrew🐉(talk) 08:18, 8 August 2026 (UTC)- The key caveats in those statements are "have used artificial intelligence to" and "by AI". It is a new use for AI, not a new process itself. CMD (talk) 09:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- That's not a caveat, it's a central feature of the story. The point is that the AI makes it much easier to vibe-code a virus and that may be both good or bad. And note that both the software and its training corpus are open source. When I checked GitHub I noticed that they had been forked many times already. It's quite incredible that the US govt repeatedly goes to war over WMD but then vainly tries shutting this stable door after the horse has bolted. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- The key caveats in those statements are "have used artificial intelligence to" and "by AI". It is a new use for AI, not a new process itself. CMD (talk) 09:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've tweaked the blurb to address your first point. On the second point, the breakthrough here is that the AI generates complete genomes not just a gene. All the coverage seems to say that this is new. For example, the NYT article starts
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement
[edit]Blurb: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey sign a trilateral collective-defence pact, the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement. (Post)
UCinternational (talk) 13:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- why is this notable and ITN-worthy? _-_Alsor ⭐️⭐️ (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support It's not everyday that three countries sign a mutual defense agreement. ArionStar (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support – Nice work to Yahya0071 and others for putting this article together. It seems comprehensive and of really good quality! Sources listed in the nomination indicate ITNSIGNIF is met. Everything looks ready to go :) ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 14:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support, significantly newsworthy, article quality is good enough. Could use a combined map. CMD (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment The pact seems unconvincing because it extends an existing defense pact between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and that doesn't seem to have stopped Iran attacking the latter. There also been skirmishes between Iran and Pakistan but none of these countries seem keen to escalate to all-out war. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- And yet Pakistan has sent thousands of troops and and fighter jets to Saudi Arabia in response to Iran's attacks. Nfitz (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Those tit-for-tat strikes by Iran and Pakistan were carried out in Jan 2024 well before the Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement was even signed in Sept 2025. ~2026-43564-91 (talk) 23:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment - I do not know enough about this pact to comment on it directly and need further clarification. The article states that countries will come to each other's aid in the event of attack, BUT is this just rhetoric or is there specific provisions for exactly what would happen? In other words, is this a symbolic agreement, or something more like NATO? Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- The agreement obviously impacts the ongoing 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war. ArionStar (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support on significance. Setarip (talk) 23:12, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: William Orbit
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by 2026-43389-23 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by PHShanghai (talk · give credit) and Aeternus (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: English musician and music producer ~2026-43389-23 (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support. Article is sufficient quality and sourced. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
(Posted) Thailand school shooting
[edit]Blurb: Shootings at a school and a residence in Nonthaburi province, Thailand, kill at least 9 people and injure 15 others. (Post)Credits:
- Nominated by ~2026-43588-17 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bloxzge 025 (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Four dead, 15 injured in Thailand school shooting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-43588-17 (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Converted this into a formal nom for the temp user who "added" this to the page. Blurb needs workshopping (if this is found to meet ITNSIGNIF). Natg 19 (talk) 07:00, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support. Nine fatalities is a lot for a school shooting. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Bloxzge above. This is getting a lot of coverage from major news outlets (on the front page of the BBC), although it must be noted that school attacks in Thailand aren't exactly rare TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 07:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Honestly, there's not that much on that list. Also, it is the nation's worst mass killing since 2022. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- It should be noted that most of these school shootings were done by adults who were either unrelated to the school or were the parents. This shooting being done by student and with this much casualties made it unprecedented. NotKringe (talk) 08:00, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- eg it feels like the equivalent of Sandy Hook (student themselves responsible for it as they currently believe). Masem (t) 11:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support This seems to be a notable incident, and the article is minimally sufficient. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support While "school attack" in Thailand is not that rare, a school shooting commited by student and with this much casualties is unprecedented. Still, I think the article needs some touch before posting. NotKringe (talk) 08:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per above This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 08:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - A major incident that is making front pages around the world. GenevieveDEon (talk) 09:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support High death count, unusual location. Setarip (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Admins willing to post ITN: BangJan1999 14:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment. I know the article is titled "shootings" but shouldn't it be "shooting?" Jessintime (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- No, the shooter from what I’ve read murdered his grandparents before going to the school. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 15:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Jessintime (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- No, the shooter from what I’ve read murdered his grandparents before going to the school. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 15:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Posted Note that I've made the blurb more concise. Schwede66 15:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment The current blurb is linking to the page for the main Debsirin School, which is misleading since it's the Nonthaburi branch of Debsirin School specifically that the incident took place, and that these "branch school" are treated as a separate one in Thailand instead of a subsidiary. NotKringe (talk) 01:55, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- The shooting is mentioned on the Debsirin School article, so I am not sure why this is misleading. Natg 19 (talk) 02:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- What I think is misleading is that the Debsirin School page is about the boy's school in Bangkok, wheas Debsirin Nonthaburi School is a unisex school in Nonthaburi, which is a completely different place. NotKringe (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've changed "Debsirin School" to "a Debsirin School branch" which I think makes the relationship clearer. Left guide (talk) 02:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- The shooting is mentioned on the Debsirin School article, so I am not sure why this is misleading. Natg 19 (talk) 02:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
August 6
[edit]|
August 6, 2026 (Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Jerney Kaagman
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Maplestrip (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Singer of Earth and Fire ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Not Ready as the discography is unsourced. Snosibsnob (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Death was announced yesterday (August 6). Article needs a bit of work, but is largely cited. This is actually my first nomination, heh. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
(Ready) RD: Sydney Towle
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Jishara (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Towle was an American social media influencer best known for documenting her journey with cancer. She died on August 5th, but it was announced on August 6th. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Well-sourced - and if you don't nominate for DYK I will.--Launchballer 16:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- I plan to write my noms for the week later today! I'd love your eyes on this and/or others. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Definitely agree. I added her name to 2026 deaths in the United States and List of Dartmouth College alumni. RIP Sydney Towle! ~2026-43402-61 (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article in good shape. RIP Sydney. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
August 5
[edit]|
August 5, 2026 (Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Bilgesu Erenus
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:
- Updated and nominated by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Turkish playwright and activist; her death was announced on August 5th. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 08:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Daniel Bernard
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Chorchapu (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Normantas Bataitis (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: French businessman, former CEO of Carrefour. Article looks good sourcing-wise but is a bit short. I plan to expand the section about his time a Carrefour because currently it’s only 1 sentence. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 12:08, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
(Ready?) RD: Philip Ruppe
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Strattonsmith (talk · give credit) and Adflatuss (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced. Death announced on this date. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Got a source that isn't WP:NEWSMAX?--Launchballer 21:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yahoo TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- I tried and couldn't find one so far. The Yahoo ref is actually just the same as the Newsmax article, but just using Yahoo as the "aggregator"? (dunno what it's called) Natg 19 (talk) 03:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- I see, but I feel if Yahoo is reusing it, it should be reliable no? TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Syndicated content takes on the reliability of its original publisher, in this case Newsmax.--Launchballer 10:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Natg 19: & @Launchballer: Found another obit from his funeral home I believe -> New obit. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- "Ruppe, the Republican who represented Michigan's 11th District from 1967 to 1979, died in August 2026 at 99, according to Newsmax." I don't think so.--Launchballer 15:31, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Launchballer:: found another one Obituary :) TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Looks like WP:UGC to me.--Launchballer 16:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Are you trying to be funny? It says right there "Source: Wikipedia public record" ~2026-37099-58 (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Launchballer:: found another one Obituary :) TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- "Ruppe, the Republican who represented Michigan's 11th District from 1967 to 1979, died in August 2026 at 99, according to Newsmax." I don't think so.--Launchballer 15:31, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Natg 19: & @Launchballer: Found another obit from his funeral home I believe -> New obit. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Syndicated content takes on the reliability of its original publisher, in this case Newsmax.--Launchballer 10:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- I see, but I feel if Yahoo is reusing it, it should be reliable no? TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- How about The Daily Mining Gazette? https://www.mininggazette.com/news/local-news/2026/08/farewell-to-an-icon/ -- PFHLai (talk) 01:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I was just gonna bring that one up @Launchballer: & @Natg 19: TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- This source looks fine to me. Natg 19 (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I was just gonna bring that one up @Launchballer: & @Natg 19: TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comments: I see two things needed here: (1) Reduced use of NewsMax as a source in the wikibio. (2) Support votes here on ITN/C from uninvolved editors. --PFHLai (talk) 11:11, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
(Closed) SpaceX lunar impact
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A Falcon 9 rocket stage hits the moon near its Einstein crater. (Post)Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Created by Kencf0618 (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Note also that there is some scientific significance as the BBC explains, This is exciting for scientists, because we know it's happening, and we know the speed and the mass of the rocket stage that will crash into the Moon. We don't normally know that for meteors that crash into the Moon every day. That means scientists will have a lot more information as they study the debris that will be caused by the collision. By studying the light that is reflected from that material, scientists can determine its composition - helping them understand how the Moon has developed and how planetary systems evolved and were formed billions of years ago.
Andrew🐉(talk) 06:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose - too soon. Literally hadn't even happened when nominated. Hours later, still not confirmed that it happened. Not seeing huge coverage - at CBC it seems to be about 50 sories down the page with the lead being Gaza and the number 2 story being Ukraine. Nfitz (talk) 09:04, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The live BBC scrolling coverage of this serendipitious bit of science notes that it'll take day and weeks for the data to be analysed. Probably 15 minutes of fame territory, and definitely nevertheless science. kencf0618 (talk) 11:20, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Why does the nomination has a photo that will almost not be used in the blurb? Howard the Duck (talk) 11:43, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- The nomination explains that the picture is a placeholder. It’s the Einstein crater which has an interesting backstory. See also pics or it didn’t happen. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support as per kencf0618. 2600 etc (talk) 11:55, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Article is currently a stub. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Article is a stub. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose as Article is a stub, coverage seems to be relatively minor, and while interesting space debris hitting the moon is not a particularly notable event on its own.
- Support on notability It's not everyday that a rocket hits the Moon. ArionStar (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- The issue is that its not "a rocket", its a discarded upper stage. Its space debris. Very different to, say, Chandrayaan's landing failure. Snosibsnob (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Piece of debris hits rock. If we blurbed for every time space debris hit something, Wikipedia would be endorsed by every garbage company in the country. ~2026-43371-41 (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose The impact is not planned nor it was for scientific purposes. Even the blurbed article barely has enough content to explain why this is significant to begin with. NotKringe (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Strong oppose really? at a loss for words for this one. Should we make articles for all the S-IVBs that crashed into the moon too? Scuba 02:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty cool event, but the fact that it wasn't planned severely undermines the significance of this to me. --SpectralIon 03:09, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose interesting but i don't think it's too significant, which is reflected by the article being nom'd for deletion. Vetrenarisisum (talk) 03:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Update Pictures of the crash site have been taken by the Korean satellite, Danuri, but they don't seem to be free so we'll have to wait for NASA images from the LRO. In the meantime, we have an interesting illustration of the trajectory thanks to Phoenix7777. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support, a notable space event. The fact that the page is at AfD is not surprising or relevant to this discussion, any editor can nominate any article. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:47, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- This is not correct. We cannot post anything that is at AfD on the main page, so until that is closed, this article is not postable.
The article does not have any other major issues. Usually, orange and red level tags are considered major enough to block posting to ITN
. (From WP:ITNBLURB) Natg 19 (talk) 01:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- This is not correct. We cannot post anything that is at AfD on the main page, so until that is closed, this article is not postable.
- Oppose – Now that the article has been expanded to start-class, and I've done a bit of copy-editing on it to get a feel for it, I am not convinced that it is of sufficient quality for a frontpage feature on ITN. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Setarip (talk) 12:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose - Pure science trivia. Interesting to some, but trivial. Harizotoh9 (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
August 4
[edit]|
August 4, 2026 (Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Sports
|
RD: Dory Funk Jr.
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by ~2026-43386-47 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: WWE Hall of Fame wrestler. R.I.P. ~2026-43386-47 (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose multi unsourced paragraphs. Natg 19 (talk) 20:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Robby Albarado
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by ~2026-43386-47 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Waluigithewalrus (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Two-time Preakness Stakes winning jockey. R.I.P. ~2026-43386-47 (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Bruno Campanella
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Italian conductor, especially for Bel Canto opera. The article was a sourceless stub. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article quality is sufficient. QuicoleJR (talk|edits) 19:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Lloyd Robertson
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Useless Niamh (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Wellington Bay (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Canadian journalist and anchor for CTV National News. Useless Niamh (talk) 15:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support. 41 years total is an impressive amount of time for someone to do journalism. Urbanracer34 (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
(Ready) Buyout of Electronic Arts
[edit]Blurb: The $55 billion leveraged buyout of video game publisher Electronic Arts by a consortium led by the Public Investment Fund is completed. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Video game publisher Electronic Arts was purchased by the Public Investment Fund in a leveraged buyout. Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: deal was completed today after all regulatory approvals. Masem (t) 21:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose the quality is there, however I don't see how this is notable enough. It's the PIFs biggest acquisition, but they are throwing a lot money around, especially in the entertainment sector. While it is the largest leveraged buyout in history, I don't really see how that's notable, especially given that it's not very large compared to other recent acquisitions and mergers. There also doesn't seem to much, if any impact, on the games industry, especially with the precedent from Microsofts acquisition of Activision. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 02:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support That list you linked says it's the second largest consummated merger in the past three years (when you exclude companies buying themselves). GreatCaesarsGhost 13:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- its also believed to be the largest leveraged buyout to date as reported by multiple sources in the target article. (EA taking on $20b in debt for this) Masem (t) 13:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose. The fact that it's an LBO (a specific type of commercial transaction) doesn't add to its significance in any way. This is basically a large buyout. Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_mergers_and_acquisitions#2020s it's only the 15th or 16th largest buyout since 2020. This isn't important enough to post on main page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oh oops I didn't see that that page was updated! This transaction is the 18th largest since 2020s. Add in 24 more >- 55bn transactions in the 2010s (nominal, not inflation adjusted!), 17 in the 2000s, and 9 in the 1990s gets you that this is the 68th largest corporate buyout since the 1990s. Ie. Not even close to the largest in recent memory. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose. The fact that it's an LBO (a specific type of commercial transaction) doesn't add to its significance in any way. This is basically a large buyout. Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_mergers_and_acquisitions#2020s it's only the 15th or 16th largest buyout since 2020. This isn't important enough to post on main page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- its also believed to be the largest leveraged buyout to date as reported by multiple sources in the target article. (EA taking on $20b in debt for this) Masem (t) 13:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support That list you linked says it's the second largest consummated merger in the past three years (when you exclude companies buying themselves). GreatCaesarsGhost 13:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose This topic is not notable enough considering ITN is for global events. CatPerson987 (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- ITN isn't "for global events," but also, this literally is a global event. An American company that trades throughout the world is bought by a Saudi organization? I mean, there's no ITN requirements for a subject to be internationally relevant, but this is as international as ITN items get so I am confused by this statement. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not seeing the significant coverage. Yes, there is a BBC article, but I don't see it in the scores of articles on their main page. It is however number 8 in their business section, where the lead is a Starbucks promotion in Korea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfitz (talk • contribs)
- we dont use placement of news relative to print or web sources as a metric, only that it is in the news. But this is also a general problem on business mergers, that the news attention is typically at the onset of the announcement to merge, and not when it actually happens. Even here, there was more news coverage last week when when the final regulatory approval ftom the EU was granted, making the actual completely a point of trivia from a news standpoint but under ITN, the point where we would normally post. Masem (t) 12:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- "expected to be completed ... around June 2026. As of January 2026, the transaction was reported to be in its final stages." Article doesn't seem to be appropriately updated yet. I think we should have high quality standards for featuring articles of this type. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I know yesterday it was more clear the deal was approved, done one seemed to have removed that. Masem (t) 12:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've returned that statement as well as eliminated the unneeded paragraph now that no longer applies. Masem (t) 12:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support – Thanks, Masem! I think we need more detail about the implications (analysis?) of this merger, but either way, we have an in-depth article on a subject that is on Reuters and the Guardian, so all seems good to me. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- have added an impact section as layoffs are projected along with a refocus on popular franchises. That will likely be fleshed out in the coming weeks. Masem (t) 15:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- The "Closure and impacts" is short but great. A fine example of the kinds of improvements I hope ITN can inspire and I hope it can be expanded more. Currently, the Responses section only has responses from 2025. Ideally, this would be updated as well. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I can tell you in following the story that since it was considered inevitably going to go through (at least, considering within the US and who was involved) that the deal being completed didn't raise a lot of further opinions (Again, why I think that business mergers need to be considered at the point of the announcement when the most coverage will be, rather than the conclusion, barring lawsuits or regulatory body denials to prevent them, but that's not the point here). Also, no actual factual events have happened that we can document yet. There's rumors flying of studios being sold off but not from any yet reputable sources (compared to the Bloomberg source for the likely layoffs). Even with the Microsoft/Activision merger, it wasn't until weeks and months later that the impacts started to be clear. Masem (t) 11:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- The "Closure and impacts" is short but great. A fine example of the kinds of improvements I hope ITN can inspire and I hope it can be expanded more. Currently, the Responses section only has responses from 2025. Ideally, this would be updated as well. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- have added an impact section as layoffs are projected along with a refocus on popular franchises. That will likely be fleshed out in the coming weeks. Masem (t) 15:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support – Thanks, Masem! I think we need more detail about the implications (analysis?) of this merger, but either way, we have an in-depth article on a subject that is on Reuters and the Guardian, so all seems good to me. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've returned that statement as well as eliminated the unneeded paragraph now that no longer applies. Masem (t) 12:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I know yesterday it was more clear the deal was approved, done one seemed to have removed that. Masem (t) 12:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - big news in the gaming industry, which is one of the largest forms of entertainment out there. Quality is there and we serve a purpose to our readers by posting this. — Knightoftheswords 12:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support, per Maplestrip and Masem. The Saudi government purchasing one of the largest entertainment companies out there is huge news. Loytra✨ 14:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Massive transaction, major political importance and likely to have at least some effect on the gaming industry and the Saudi Arabian economy. Article quality is also sufficient. QuicoleJR (talk|edits) 18:00, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I am generally opposed to posting business news, however, we did post the announcement of the acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft in 2022. Natg 19 (talk) 18:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support As business news goes this is quite significant. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 19:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Since this is some of the most high-profile takeover by the PIF in quite awhile, and is getting noticable buzz due to the clashing "inclusivity" public image between EA and PIF. NotKringe (talk) 23:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Not just significant in the gaming industry, but also politically with the PIF. Article is good. Vetrenarisisum (talk) 03:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support on notability While I agree with some of the oppose comments that LBOs and other business deals are normally not significant enough for ITN, the instrumental involvement of Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund (PIF) in buying out Electronic Arts makes this an unusual event. As QuicoleJR points out, this carries importance for both the gaming industry worldwide and Saudi Arabian foreign policy and fiscal policy. Oppius Brutus (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Significant transaction that has large implications for the video game industry as well as political importance due to PIF involvement. Article is in good shape for ITN. MidnightMayhem (talk) 18:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose on notability. It's not on the front page of https://www.nytimes.com/section/business/dealbook, https://www.bbc.com/business, nor anywhere on Aljazeera.com when I try searching. It's clear that this is just industry relevant but not broader relevant. This is routine business happenings, we don't post all the business news on this page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 19:20, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
— Duplicate !vote: QueensanditsCrazy (talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
- we do not require nor expect ITN items to be front page news, nor are news on the front page necessarily good ITN items. Masem (t) 20:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- It shows you that it's not really in the news. Also, it's not even the largest gaming buyout ever: per the BBC article cited in the nom, "The deal ranks as the second-biggest acquisition in gaming history, after Microsoft's $69bn purchase of Activision Blizzard, the company behind Call of Duty..." The fact that it's an LBO is not significant for our audience - it just means that PIF borrowed money to complete the transaction. The BBC article cited in original nom is pretty detailed but the Verge or CNBC article are both pretty scant on analysis. Overall this is a nothing burger in the broader financial world. I suppose it's important in the Saudi financial world but cmon our scope as Wikipedia is larger than that. This subject is not big enough to merit inclusion on the front page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- See my above comment, it's abotu the 68th largest corporate buyout since the 1990s. This transaction simply isn't big enough or wide-reaching enough to merit significant ongoing coverage (reminder that this is a criteria for ITN inclusion is that the effects will last a while and can be covered by sources. What more is there for journalists to say about this??).QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- How many of those 67 buyouts were subject to a stand-alone article in our encyclopedia? Even if they all had been of sufficient public interest to warrant an article, I think ~2 ITN features each year about a massive financial buyout would've been fine. But we only post what we write anyway, and this is one we've written. It's a bit of a WP:OSE argument to oppose an article because its subject doesn't win in the total numbers game. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't oppose posting because it fails the numbers game. I oppose the posting because it is not notable enough outside a specific industry segment. I'm merely pointing out that one of the arguments in favor of posting, ie. that it wins the numbers game, is merely Wikipedia:HTRIVIA. The difference between a LBO and a regular M&A transaction is just trivia. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- How many of those 67 buyouts were subject to a stand-alone article in our encyclopedia? Even if they all had been of sufficient public interest to warrant an article, I think ~2 ITN features each year about a massive financial buyout would've been fine. But we only post what we write anyway, and this is one we've written. It's a bit of a WP:OSE argument to oppose an article because its subject doesn't win in the total numbers game. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- ITN is not a news ticker, we do not rely on what other news sites or newspapers are putting at the top of the headlines. Its also been as long as its covered in some way by recent news. And outside of print, we cannot judge topic placement on websites due to numerous things (personalization, geolocation serving, etc.) We just require that it is covered in reliable news sources and the article properly updated to reflect. And also, many of those RSes identify this as the largest known leveraged buyout to date, with EA taking on $18b in debt (at a interest rate of $1.8b a year) that they have to cover. Masem (t) 11:48, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- RSes identify this is a very large LBO yes but the difference between LBO and any other merger & acquisition is, in my view, not important enough to merit an article on the front page. To make a sports analogy this is like saying a player achieved the highest batting average ever or the most number of interceptions ever. It's just financial trivia that yes contributes to notability, but not enough to merit a front page slot. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 14:19, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- That's a poor analogy. Those two records have stood for 100 and 50 years, respectively, and are effectively unassailable. The active leader in interceptions has less that half the record, and he's 37 years old. GreatCaesarsGhost 16:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- RSes identify this is a very large LBO yes but the difference between LBO and any other merger & acquisition is, in my view, not important enough to merit an article on the front page. To make a sports analogy this is like saying a player achieved the highest batting average ever or the most number of interceptions ever. It's just financial trivia that yes contributes to notability, but not enough to merit a front page slot. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 14:19, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- See my above comment, it's abotu the 68th largest corporate buyout since the 1990s. This transaction simply isn't big enough or wide-reaching enough to merit significant ongoing coverage (reminder that this is a criteria for ITN inclusion is that the effects will last a while and can be covered by sources. What more is there for journalists to say about this??).QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- It shows you that it's not really in the news. Also, it's not even the largest gaming buyout ever: per the BBC article cited in the nom, "The deal ranks as the second-biggest acquisition in gaming history, after Microsoft's $69bn purchase of Activision Blizzard, the company behind Call of Duty..." The fact that it's an LBO is not significant for our audience - it just means that PIF borrowed money to complete the transaction. The BBC article cited in original nom is pretty detailed but the Verge or CNBC article are both pretty scant on analysis. Overall this is a nothing burger in the broader financial world. I suppose it's important in the Saudi financial world but cmon our scope as Wikipedia is larger than that. This subject is not big enough to merit inclusion on the front page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- we do not require nor expect ITN items to be front page news, nor are news on the front page necessarily good ITN items. Masem (t) 20:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Will be of great interest to our readers. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Oppius Brutus and others above. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 05:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The acquisition of one of the biggest video games companies in the world is significant, as the announcement was not posted. ArionStar (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not notable outside the industry. Nosferattus (talk) 16:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- so why are sources like BBC, CNBC and others like Reuters The Guardian, and Variety covering it to some degree? I would agree that if this was only coming from gaming and tech sites, sure, that's too narrow. But this has been well in the major financial news and has political connections (as Jared Kushner's group is also involved) Masem (t) 22:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- So the President's son-in-law's private equity firm has bought 5% of a major company? That's nowhere near direct enough to make it major enough to put on front page. Besides, the RSes cited only give Kushner and Affinity Partners passing mention in a couple sentences. Affinity Partners has only 5bn AUM (total!!!) whereas the LBO was for 55bn; clearly Affinity Partners here is only the tail being wagged by PIF the dog, so to speak. The RSes don't imply that Kushner or Affinity was a major driver in making this investment happen. This is nothing more than the usual Trump administration conflict of interest, it's not clear to me that this even is the biggest one they've done. I don't see much political relevance here. Oppose QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
— Duplicate !vote: QueensanditsCrazy (talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
- You've now !votes 3 times. You should strike your other opposes. Masem (t) 04:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- So the President's son-in-law's private equity firm has bought 5% of a major company? That's nowhere near direct enough to make it major enough to put on front page. Besides, the RSes cited only give Kushner and Affinity Partners passing mention in a couple sentences. Affinity Partners has only 5bn AUM (total!!!) whereas the LBO was for 55bn; clearly Affinity Partners here is only the tail being wagged by PIF the dog, so to speak. The RSes don't imply that Kushner or Affinity was a major driver in making this investment happen. This is nothing more than the usual Trump administration conflict of interest, it's not clear to me that this even is the biggest one they've done. I don't see much political relevance here. Oppose QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- so why are sources like BBC, CNBC and others like Reuters The Guardian, and Variety covering it to some degree? I would agree that if this was only coming from gaming and tech sites, sure, that's too narrow. But this has been well in the major financial news and has political connections (as Jared Kushner's group is also involved) Masem (t) 22:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
August 3
[edit]|
August 3, 2026 (Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
(Ready) RD: Paula Alí
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:
- Updated and nominated by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Cuban stage, film, and tv actress. Died this Monday in Havana. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 06:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support 3165 characters (522 words) "readable prose size" and sourced. Grimes2 19:22, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article quality is sufficient. QuicoleJR (talk|edits) 13:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Mateusz Bąk
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Polish footballer, Lechia Gdańsk legend. Article very undercited and I have orange tagged it, needs updating on his post-playing years and death, but plenty of sources available if any of the footballing editors would like to expand the article. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Jimmy Cricket
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Updated and nominated by ItsShandog (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Northern Irish comedian. ItsShandog (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment style section totally unsourced, but if his act had several motifs for several decades, it's bound to be mentioned in sources. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Cited. ItsShandog (talk) 08:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
August 2
[edit]|
August 2, 2026 (Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Politics and elections
|
(New) RD: Tsurumaru Tsuyoshi
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by GhostStalker (talk · give credit)
- Updated by ItzAPotato2009 (talk · give credit) and DeepDishDestroyer (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Japanese racehorse, winner of the 1999 G2 Kyōto Daishōten, last prominent offspring of Japanese Classic Triple Crown winner Symboli Rudolf. Article was published from Draft on date of death announcement. Might need some more work for sourcing, albeit sufficient in my view. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 21:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Rod Liddle
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Black Kite (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Controversial journalist whose later writings were provocative (to say the least) along with some, er, interesting events in his personal life. Article is orange-tagged for neutrality but no serious discussion on talk page for nearly two years so that can probably be removed (and I note his most famous outrageous quote isn't even mentioned in the article!). Article is pretty-well sourced, there may be a few odd statements. Black Kite (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- POV tag was removed a matter of minutes before you posted here and the "shag the kids" quote had been removed about an hour ago. I readded it in a way that was actually due. I also added a couple of cn tags.--Launchballer 15:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Kay Granger
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Flipandflopped (talk · give credit)
- Updated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Texas congresswoman who once was the Chair of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. Very fresh news, so article may need further updating. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 01:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Well sourced, but would like to see more information on her tenure as Mayor of Fort Worth. Natg 19 (talk) 01:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed, more info about her tenure as mayor of Fort Worth is needed. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
August 1
[edit]|
August 1, 2026 (Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Sports
|
(Review needed) RD: Nadhira Al Harthy
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:
- Nominated by Natg 19 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by IvanScrooge98 (talk · give credit) and Qhairun (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Killed in the avalanche, looks ready. Natg 19 (talk) 18:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Natalia Dontcheva
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by Useless Niamh (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Bulgarian-born French actress. Article is pretty bare bones so hope it can be improved in time. Useless Niamh (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose - article is a stub, does not meet requirements currently. - Indefensible (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
(Posted separate blurb and RD) 2026 Broad Peak avalanche & RD: Nirmal Purja
[edit]Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers, including Nepalese-British mountaineer Nirmal Purja (pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: Nepalese-British mountaineer Nirmal Purja is killed along with nine others following an avalanche in the Pakistani Himalayas.
Alternative blurb 2: In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers. (This leaves Nirmal Purja, Nadhira Al Harthy, Pur Bahadur Gurung and others for the RD line as separate ITN candidates.)
- Updated and nominated by ItsShandog (talk · give credit)
- Updated by ArionStar (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Nepali mountaineer known for record‑setting speed ascents. ItsShandog (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The disaster itself is notable and receives media coverage, so the nomination should focus on the story instead of Purja. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:31, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Merged nom - ArionStar (talk · contribs) nominated the broader avalanche article a few hours later, so I've merged it in here. Support, receiving sustainable news coverage, in the news, Purja seems to be a "top of his field" sort of character, so both the incident and his article should be bolded per WP:ITNRDBLURB. — Knightoftheswords 15:32, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support alt blurb as the avalanche and Purja are notable. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support blurb articles are ok. Grimes2 16:22, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I think focusing on Purja is wrong. Its not clear he would meet the "major figure", but if we treat this as "death as the story", then yes, this fits. That said, there are also two other people that died that have blue-linkes. Yukta's was created in the wake of this event and likely does not meet BLP1E (all sources are from this event's coverage), but the other one Al Harthy is definitely beyond BLP1E and in decent shape if that was just an RD. So to include Purja (featured or not) and not Al Harthy is a problem. Hence why the first blurb is a better start, "In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers, including mountaineers Nirmal Purja and Nadhira Al Harthy." Masem (t) 16:41, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see the need for the Nirmal Purja article to be bolded. ArionStar (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see the need for the Nirmal Purja article to be bolded. ArionStar (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment / Suggestion: Let's consider a blurb with a bolded link to 2026 Broad Peak disaster a separate nom from the RD now for Nirmal Purja, shall we? --PFHLai (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- I prefer his article being mentioned in the blurb, only. ArionStar (talk) 23:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- It makes more sense to me to have a blurb on 2026 Broad Peak avalanche without mentioning specific victims, and have Nirmal Purja and Nadhira Al Harthy on the RD line. That would be three separate ITN candidates, to be evaluated and promoted to ITN separately. --PFHLai (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Pur Bahadur Gurung may be counted as a 4th candidate, but maybe not long enough (yet)? --PFHLai (talk) 03:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I prefer his article being mentioned in the blurb, only. ArionStar (talk) 23:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support bolded disaster since that is the notable event. Good nomination, notable as event, so the RDB is acceptable This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 22:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Split noms. No need to single out Purja if we have two other individuals with articles who were killed as well. DarkSide830 (talk) 01:43, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Please feel free to nominate the other wikibios for RD as separate candidates. --PFHLai (talk) 18:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not going to unmerge without consensus considering they were already merged. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Excuse me, what does "unmerge" mean? Not bolding the link seems like not recognizing the linked article as an ITN candidate. Would that be "unmerging the noms"? The "other individuals with articles who were killed as well" can go to the RD line instead of staying on the blurb. --PFHLai (talk) 08:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not going to unmerge without consensus considering they were already merged. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Please feel free to nominate the other wikibios for RD as separate candidates. --PFHLai (talk) 18:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The original blurb seems ok. My main qualm is that Purja's article has some controversial sections about sexual assault allegations and The Himalayan Times. These need careful scrutiny to ensure accuracy and compliance. They could also use some clarification as I'm not fully understanding the fuss about the newspaper coverage. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Posted blurb and separate RD No consensus to combine Purja into blurb.—Bagumba (talk) 04:55, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
RD: Vincent Pastore
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
- Nominated by CantBelieveINeedAnAccount (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: American actor. Best known for his role in The Sopranos. CantBelieveINeedAnAccount (talk) 02:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Not yet ready Several unsourced paragraphs and unsourced acting credits section. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
References
[edit]Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: