Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watch the Throne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Watch the Throne

Watch the Throne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not noteable future EP without a tracklist. Violates WP:CRYSTAL Red Flag on the Right Side 00:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

• Keep. Not notable? It's only from the two biggest artists in rap. humblefool® 03:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

No release date, no tracklist, no cover = not noteable. Red Flag on the Right Side 03:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

• Delete. Agreeing with Static here, since information about the album is incredibly vague. The article can be remade after there is more information about the album. For the being, non-notable album and possibly WP:CRYSTAL. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 18:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Changing to keep. Now, some sources are starting to appear. It took some time for this to happen. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 20:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

• Delete. Notable performer, yes, but work is only an EP, still 3/5 unreleased (AFAICT), non-charting, non-award-winning, with only the briefest of mention from the article's refs. Per WP:NALBUMS, certainly not worthy of its own article, not much need of even a paragraph in West's article (and I notice that this article is really only five sentences long). — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. This will not stay short. Kanye plans to release music every Friday until Christmas. So there will be more. Keep —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.128.77 (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. Nymf _hideliho! 13:46, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This does not appear on the AfD log for September 1 or 2. Listing for the first time (as far as I can tell) now. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
• Delete too soon for an article. Would it kill you fanboys to show a little patience?! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
• Delete or merge to GOOD Music as article fails notability criteria for albums. There is no tracklist and cover. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 22:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
• Keep - tracklist, or any other arbitrary measure, is not necessary. It is enough that there are good sources. Future albums that meet the general notability guidelines should not be deleted because they lack album artwork, etc. Savidan 04:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
• Keep Even though it is short, the article is well sourced (also, the first single has been released since the article was nominated for deletion). Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.