Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOVA-MBA Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar  02:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC)reply

NOVA-MBA Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pure promotionalism; a good deal of the article is simply a list of sponsors. DGG ( talk ) 04:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply

Can remove that section - agreed. But delete the entire page? Association does meet criteria of notability ... would keep no? Filippo Scognamiglio (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)reply

I have the removed the controversial section on sponsors. Filippo Scognamiglio (talk) 07:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)reply



Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)reply

If no further comments are added, can the discussion be closed and the notice removed? Filippo Scognamiglio (talk) 06:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.