Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milwaukee-style pizza
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Milwaukee-style pizza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Milwaukee-style pizza is just Chicago-style thin crust pizza sold in Milwaukee. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 04:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. I found but overall the sources are few and not particularly professional. It does seem like mostly promotional / social media catchphrase.
I cannot even load 2 of the 3 sources, but the one I can is again, not particularly good. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG IMHO.Having opened the other 2 sources (they just load very slowly), they do seem to mention and define the concept. However. the coverage is limited to Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and some blogs/promotional sites. I am not sure this suffices for a food to gain notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC) - Delete. No real evidence of notability. Sources are blogs, and Ben is correct that the pizza described is the same as another style. oknazevad (talk) 12:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.