Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laggardship (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Notability not established under WP:NEO j⚛e deckertalk 03:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Laggardship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism which is hardly in wide-spread use, as far as I can see. (Note that the word was purportedly invented by the CEO of Comeback America, and the username of the page's creator is ComebackAmerica.) JoelWhy?(talk) 19:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - was deleted before and should be deleted again as a non-notable neologism that is using Wikipedia in an attempt to promote itself. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per Bushranger. It's also a clumsy buzzword. --BDD (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as per the previous two posters. Undeserving of an article. --Drm310 (talk) 15:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per Bushranger. →TSU tp* 11:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.