Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Chen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 22:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)reply

Joseph Chen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a photographer. He's attended prestigious schools and worked with celebrity models, but that is not enough to confer notability. His exhibitions at notable venues might have been enough for WP:GNG but I can't find any coverage of the exhibitions in reliable sources. bonadea contributions talk 10:03, 10 December 2012 (UTC)reply

Comment The Hollywood Weekly article has a brief mention of Chen - this is not significant coverage and notability is, unfortunately, still not shown.. --bonadea contributions talk 17:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)reply
  • Delete - Searching is difficult as the name is not uncommon (there are quite a few Joseph Chens out there, including another photographer who does weddings) but what I could find was basically self published/promotional, very little third-party, let alone reliable. Mabalu (talk) 10:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.