Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzy Duck (drinking game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —cyberpower ChatLimited Access 18:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)reply

Fuzzy Duck (drinking game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a drinking game that fails WP:GNG. Finding no coverage in reliable sources. Coverage exists about a restaurant/lounge in Rome with this name (see ) and about a record of this name by a band (see ), but not finding any for the drinking game. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 18:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 18:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)reply
  • Keep There's several references on Google Books to books of drinking games containing this though most aren't on preview (I found: 101 Great Drinking Games by Andrew Studdard, Social Lubrication by Temple Drake, The Book of Beer Awesomeness by Ben Applebaum & Dan DiSorbo, The complete book of beer drinking games by Andy Griscom & Scott Johnston), and other non-fiction books that cover heavy-drinking subcultures (e.g. Making doctors by Simon Sinclair). Also miscellaneous mentions in other media. This is a well-known British game not something that would fall under WP:MADEUP. --Colapeninsula (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)reply
  • Keep if Colapeninsula or someone else can put the sources into the article, per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 15:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.