Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudius Pulcher

Claudius Pulcher

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Claudius Pulcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ancient Roman nomen/cognomen pairings aren't appropriate for dab pages. The entries should probably be merged to Pulcher. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Made a post to WT:CGR. Ifly6 (talk) 18:33, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
• Simply asserting that pages of the form [nomen cognomen] should not be disambiguation pages is not a particularly compelling reason for deletion. Why not? This isn't even the only such page – there's also e.g. Caecilius Metellus (and where there's a primary topic for the nomen/cognomen pair, we get pages like Scipio Africanus (disambiguation).) Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 18:45, 11 August 2026 (UTC)