Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Foundation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Bitcoin. MBisanz talk 16:29, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bitcoin Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet GNG, also NOTINHERITED, and "existence is not notability." This article was likely created to create false notability for Bitcoin (via bluelinks in its article), as this is just one of several articles (all AfDed) dealing with this topic area and created by the same (now blocked) SPA. There are a lot of GHits, but they all lead back to blogs and such that seem to draw on the same Forbes.com article on the creation of the Foundation on 9/26/2012. MSJapan (talk) 01:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC) MSJapan (talk) 01:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete or merge with Bitcoin. Subject lacks notability of its own. - MrX 02:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Merge into Bitcoin, for lack of independent notability. -- The Anome (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Merge into Bitcoin. Article has almost no independent content, and no demonstrated independent notability. If we have sources covering it, then it will fit nicely in the parent article. If we don't, then it doesn't belong anywhere. — Jess· Δ♥ 19:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Your Lord and Master (talk) 00:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.