Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jabal Shada

Battle of Jabal Shada

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Battle of Jabal Shada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There is no WP:SIGCOV in the academic sources, and I searched the Authors of the cited sources and found that none of them have an education in academic History. Searching "Battle of Jabal Shada" gives no results relating to this war and instead gives results relating to spillovers of the current civil war in Yemen or the "Jabal Shada Natural Reserve" in Saudi. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 14:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Idrisid–Mutawakillite war and merge anything suitable (although it seems like there's nothing). Scarce coverage in Arabic indicates there can be nothing found in other languages. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• @HerrHeulsuse: I've already pointed out in Talk:Idrisid–Mutawakillite war#Recent additions and in my edit summaries in that article that the authors of the sources cited are self-proclaimed "historians" with 0 academic background. Why should we preserve content that isn't even supported by WP:RS 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Any of that coverage indicates it could be searched. That's enough for me HerrHeulsuse (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)