Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Main page Articles for improvement Article nominations Schedule Assessment Accomplishments Automation & templates Participants Talk page 

This page is for nominating articles to be listed as articles for improvement, from which the weekly collaborations are pulled. Any article or list on Wikipedia can be nominated, although articles that do not meet the suggested criteria are unlikely to gain consensus.


Instructions

[edit]

Nominations

[edit]

Applied sciences and technology

[edit]

Arts

[edit]

Adult animation

[edit]

Adult animation  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 780 daily hits

  1. Oppose, the grammar will be fixed before theis becomes afi. the article is decent and long enough. SVcode(Talk) 20:22, 1 July 2026 (UTC)reply

The Hart of London

[edit]

The Hart of London  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 5 daily hits

  1. Oppose, article is not notable for AFI. SVcode(Talk) 16:55, 23 May 2026 (UTC)reply

Everyday life

[edit]

Head-on collision

[edit]

Head-on collision  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 66 daily hits

  1. Support - could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:26, 25 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Jewellery

[edit]

Jewellery  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 9913 daily hits

  • This article was delisted from GA due to glaring issues including copyediting and uncited paragraphs. It is a level 3 vital article that's a start class. 17:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Geography

[edit]

History and politics

[edit]

List of assassinated people from Turkey

[edit]

List of assassinated people from Turkey  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 13 daily hits

Language and literature

[edit]

Spartacus (Gibbon novel)

[edit]

Spartacus (Gibbon novel)  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 7 daily hits

  • A book that may interest people due to its famous film adaptation, Not actually related to the famous film, but may intrigue people making the same mistake as me, and still a notable book ripe for expansion because it is currently almost nothing but a brief plot summary. ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 23:22, 6 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  1. Oppose, Not popular enough for AFI. SVcode(Talk) 17:40, 14 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Mathematics and computer science

[edit]

FAAC

[edit]

FAAC  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 11 daily hits

  1. Oppose, not much AFI can do, too techinical for AFI. SVcode(Talk) 16:25, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Natural sciences

[edit]

People/Companies and organisations/Products

[edit]

Grant (money)

[edit]

Grant (money)  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 68 daily hits

  • This article has multiple issues:
    • The sentences use inconsistent British and American spellings (see here).
    • There are various grammar and organizational issues.
    • It relies excessively on references to primary sources.
    • The lead section may need to be rewritten.
I’ve made a to-do list highlighting all these issues and talked to WikiProject Finance and Investment. 2600 etc (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 17:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Lego

[edit]

Lego  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 2292 daily hits

  1. Oppose, article looks decent enough that AFI can't do much about it. SVcode(Talk) 17:03, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Hussain Muhammad Ershad

[edit]

Hussain Muhammad Ershad  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 162 daily hits

  1. Oppose, article looks decent, doesn't need AFI help. SVcode(Talk) 23:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC)reply

Amplify Energy

[edit]

Amplify Energy  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 8 daily hits

  • This article has strange prose. The flow of text throughout could be vastly improved, and some info could likely quite easily be removed as irrelevant. It currently acts more as a list of tangentially-related information, rather than a proper article about the company in question. There are also numerous direct links which should be properly cited. I have made some improvements, but more are required. Low number of daily hits, so not necessarily a priority, but adding it here as I edited it today. Husskeyy (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC)reply
  1. Oppose, not notable. SVcode(Talk) 21:48, 10 April 2026 (UTC)reply

Psychology

[edit]

Positive behavior support  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 434 daily hits

  • This article has potential but needs a major copy edit and copyvio removal. It gets a decent amount of traffic and used to get more. I imagine people stumble upon this article accidentally not knowing what it is. -Wil540 art (talk) 14:26, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 14:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Philosophy and religion

[edit]

Islamic extremism

[edit]

Islamic extremism  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 327 daily hits

  1. Oppose, the only issue here is copyedit. GOCE will get this before this becomes AFI. SVcode(Talk) 15:38, 26 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Society and social sciences

[edit]

Stretcher bearer

[edit]

Stretcher bearer  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 17 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:57, 10 April 2026 (UTC)reply

Mass Arrest

[edit]

Mass arrest  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 19 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)reply

Sport

[edit]

World Chess Championship 1978

[edit]

World Chess Championship 1978  (page view stats  edit  talk  history) - 64 daily hits

  • High-importance chess article of significant public interest featuring transcendental meditation, controversial yoghurt and black magic, however the story is barely covered in the article. I think the page views are potentially misleading as this would get a lot more attention if the article were better. Stockhausenfan (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply