Template talk:Numero
Add topicLatest comment: 6 months ago by Bkell in topic Why "No." instead of "№"
Why "No." instead of "№"
[edit]For this template specifically, it would make more sense to use "№" instead of "No." as it is less ambiguous, and they look almost identical anyway. Changing the template to incorporate the № symbol would be difficult at all, and it wouldn't negatively affect that many pages either. Why not switch? --Diriector Doc (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Done Jalapeño (u t g) 14:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- See MOS:NUMERO. The symbol "№" should not be used in Wikipedia articles. I have reverted the change to this template. —Bkell (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)