Template talk:Expand language
Add topic| Template:Expand language is indefinitely protected from editing as it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Expand language template. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
This template was nominated for deletion. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
|
improving template
[edit]@Mathglot: pinging you at your request. My earlier post: " Right now the link for corresponding article has a switch so that it calls Wikidata information where the article is not specified. I would like the same behavior to happen for the creation of the machine translation link at translate.google.com." Basically, if there is not an article name specified, I want there to be a Google translate link generated based on the title in the foreign language at wikidata. (Currently, if no title is specified, no machine translation link is added.) This behavior already exists elsewhere in the template, just trying to add it for the machine translation as well. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: thoughts? Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Calliopejen1, this might need a feature that is not yet available in order to implement it. I got a response at Module talk:Wd#Titles from other wikipedias to a question I posed there, regarding a subtask that I believe would be necessary in order to implement your request. I'm still looking around for other methods that might work; perhaps Thayts will have an idea. Mathglot (talk) 05:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
That one went stale, but I re-upped with this discussion. Adding User:Calliopejen1. Mathglot (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Insufficient warning
[edit]Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article
This warning is insufficient. Not once I had to revert translations from other wikipedias with close to no refernces. I am sure the translators get frustrated. See e.g. Talk:Vadim Shefner.
IMO the text "If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article" is toothless. I think that instead it must say "Do not translate articles with very few or no references" or something like that. Also mentioning WP:CITE and WP:RS would be good. --Altenmann >talk 08:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 12 February 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate" to "Machine translation, like DeepL, Kagi Translate or Google Translate"
Since Kagi Translate is improved with added features, this will be useful. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before posting an edit request. Is there any evidence that "Kagi Translate" is popular or recognizable enough that this wouldn't just be advertising for a niche search engine? Anomie⚔ 01:11, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
New icon
[edit]Despite the dark mode improvements, the new icon looks a lot worse. I do not understand why this was replaced without any input. CutlassCiera 21:32, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
- Exactly this, talk about soulless. It's literally worse in every way, besides consistency with other unwise changes; there was zero reason to remove the red from the arrow which signalled urgency in a sea of slop. I think it's especially tone-deaf in context of these days, most people sick of ultra-minimalism and color quite literally drained from society. Wikipedia is supposed to feel stable and timeless. Why would you do this @Newzby:? Please change it back. ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 14:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Reverted pending further discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- FYI, Newbzy did the same thing to several other templates. Anomie⚔ 16:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ping correct username: User:Newbzy Anomie⚔ 22:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've amended the icon to use the colours (but not added it back). I apologize for the disruption caused. Newbzy (talk) 01:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Reverted pending further discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)