This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I'm intrigued how someone divorced can claim to be - or regarded as - an expert in relatioinships. Either she failed to make her marriage work or married a complete no-hoper. Either way, hardly firm evidence of expertise in this specific area, is it? Just a thought.. 82.110.109.21210:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Re the above, my thought is perhaps it helps to have gone through a divorce to learn more?
Anyway, she can't live in both Richmond and Notting Hill, so this article needs work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.206.64 (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Divorce is now so commonplace and entered into with such varying circumstances and motives, I think marital status is neither here nor there with regard to a person's claim to being a relationship expert. Perhaps it is rather the way the words 'relationship expert' are used and how you define 'expert' that is the ground for criticism. It is no doubt part of her life experience, experience should inform expertise. Are we to consider relationship experts genuine only if they managed to stay married to one person throughout life - like Ruth Westheimer and Claire Rayner?Cloptonson (talk) 06:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
'She studied journalism and psychology at Queensland University...' - what does this mean? Did she leave after a day, or does she have a psychology degree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.82.212 (talk) 21:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've deleted a whole load of unsourced material as per WP:BLP: in addition to a lack of citations, most of the material I've removed is poorly written, bordering on the trivial and, from its tone, probably lifted from another source ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
