Talk:The Seattle Times
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 156.74.250.8 in topic Citations to self-description
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Seattle Times article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Citations to self-description
[edit]Several citations/links in this page reference articles and descriptions from the Seattle Times itself. When it comes to accounts of the paper's internal business, etc. that probably doesn't matter, but when the description is editorial (i.e., "is widely renowned for its investigative journalism" (intro) that seems less reliable. Can/should this be cleaned up to rely less on self-reference? 156.74.250.8 (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Mid-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Newspapers articles
- Mid-importance Newspapers articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- High-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- C-Class Seattle articles
- High-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English

