Talk:The Saison
Add topicYou are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Secret police
[edit]See secret police. If they were cooperating with Begin, then I reckon it fits the definition. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 04:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- We can't use the phrase "secret police" unless it is used by the source, but no source is given so we have a problem. Also, the next section refers to MI5 who were not police at all but military intelligence. Zerotalk 06:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Sourcing
[edit]As far as I can see, the Jewish Virtual Library article by Yehuda Lapidot doesn't justify either of the sentences in the History section which it has supposedly been cited to support: "In 1943, as the tide was shifting in favor of the Allies, the Agency decided to assist the British in any possible way, hoping to gain political benefits after the war. The Irgun and Lehi opposed the decision, which resulted in a heated confrontation."
The etzel.org.il website has been cited twice. I doubt that it has a reputation for reliability or fact checking, as required by reliable sources.
← ZScarpia 14:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Even where supportive, JVL is generally unreliable and better replaced with something superior. Etzel is blocked by my network, so I can't actually check what that's like, but that alone does not inspire confidence. I have a feeling that is neither peer-reviewed or a source with mainstream media standards. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- Palestine-related articles needing attention
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Israel-related articles
- Low-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Low-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- C-Class British Empire articles
- Low-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages
