Talk:Tatra K5

Tatra K5 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 28, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

GA review

Latest comment: 9 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tatra K5/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 01:01, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Saltymagnolia (talk · contribs) 11:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @User:CosXZ. I'll be taking this one. ✦ Salty magnolia ✦ 11:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Y @CosXZ I'll be passing this one. I discovered some minor issues, but nothing a CE couldn't fix. I did remove the statement about the AR designation, since it wasn't supported by the cited source. If you have another source which substantiates it, feel free to add it again. ❆ 鬼 SALTY 鬼 ❆ 13:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply