Talk:Tasha Reign

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belle Knox

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It would be nice if the article about Belle Knox could be left alone to just exist, but the hypocrisy of this site was more than evident in the delete discussion. Adding it to tangential articles seems the best we can accomplish for now. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Miriam Weeks is her real name, and she's getting a lot more coverage now, so I was surprised not to find her article. —Pawyilee (talk) 07:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rolling Stone

Date of Birth

Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hey @Sangdeboeuf @Cullen328 Once more, is this one problematic? Is this inviting stalkers? ~2025-39885-95 (talk) 18:04, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This date of birth is poorly referenced. Unless a reference to a reliable source can be provided, it should be removed. Cullen328 (talk) 18:59, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Let's remove it then ~2025-39885-95 (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:32, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply