Talk:Steven Woodrow
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments following Trump Assassination Attempt
[edit]His comments attracted wide condemnation from all political perspectives. The condemnation cannot be portrayed as a conservative hit job. His own party condemned his statement, which is especially notable. Jttx76 (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Career
[edit]The Complete Colorado article "Colorado state rep. poised for juicy payout" (reference 9) does not support the proposition that "Woodrow used his position to ensure large payouts to himself and other trial lawyers for class action lawsuits that would otherwise not move forward," because the law had to do with the amount of damages that plaintiffs could recover, not the threshold for when a lawsuit can move forward. The article also does not support the proposition that the bill has "has earned him millions in fees," because it does not cite a case that has actually been decided in favor of Woodrow's clients and which was subject to the new law. The source is also tabloid source, which violates Wikipedia's rules for biographies of living persons.
The 9 news article "Colorado Lawmaker Uses 'Legislative Privilege' To Get Out Of Speeding Ticket" (reference 10) does not support the proposition that "Woodrow argued that legislators should not be subject to the law," because he only argued that the Constitution applied to his speeding ticket. He did not argue that legislators should not be subject to the law, generally. AnaxyrusPunctatus (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Colorado articles
- Unknown-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- Stub-Class US State Legislatures articles
- Unknown-importance US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
- Articles created or improved during the United States 20,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles



