Talk:Srinath Raghavan
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Kautilya3 in topic Perry Anderson
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Perry Anderson
[edit]What's the relevance of the author here? We can find better references right? My Lord (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thats not a good objection to a critique from such a prominent historian. So the question that you ought to ask is "why can't we have his critique of Raghavan here?" Its certainly more worthy, judging by the number of cites on Google Scholar, than most of the others who have been cited on the article. Whats the motive behind removing the scholarly criticism? That is against WP:NPOV. It may even be a BLP violation.DarSahab (talk) 15:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- First off, let me say that I mixed up this Perry Anderson with somebody else. I think my objection was suitably answered by Obaid Raza.
- However, now that I look at the book and the so-called critique of Raghavan there, I continue to have concerns. Let me do a bit more reading and get back here with more comments. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)