Talk:Science of team science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

What is the Science of team science?

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is this just a concept or is there an actual team, or what? The lead needs to clarify what this is. The article's too long to try to figure out what the team is, and the references and External links don't help. The "Further reading section is a confusing, too long to be helpful. There's really not enough reference sources to explain. Star767 (talk) 02:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Additional inline references and external sources have been added to the article (including the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Science of Team Science web site, established in early 2013), to help clarify and document the content of the article and the SciTS field more generally. Hetz3486 —Preceding undated comment added 07:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is this article about anything of substance?

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article does not appear to be about something that's sufficiently specific and noteworthy to demand encyclopedic inclusion. As is, this may merit removal, or a complete rewrite. The bulk of the "Science of Team Science" work seems to have been a set of minor conferences between 2013 and 2015: https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/the-science-of-team-science

I have added the "Notability" tag and would suggest considering this article for deletion. JohnLoeber (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

There is ongoing reference to the topic of SciTS though I agree that it appears to have been more popular in the past. IMO SciTS would likely be used as reference in grant proposal applications to speak to using best practices based on SciTS.

It might be useful to include a list specific topic areas of SciTS like leadership, conflict resolution, etc. along with study results… but I’m not sure I want to take that on at my current experience level with editing. Haha

Will watch page and collaborate if someone is interested in developing this topic more. Taymodnz (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply