Talk:Roger Birkman

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I see that in Web of Science only 5 people have ever cited the principal paper in the Southern Medical Journal. Even Google Scholar, with its much wider scope, only list 10. I see that the principal book., True colors, is held in only 87 libraries, according to WorldCat, and Google Scholar has only 2 cites to it. I see nothing else worth mentioning. Unless there are some real citations to the widespread use of his methd, I shall be nominating it for deletion

This seems to be advertising drivel from the birkman website rather then a wiki entry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.148.198.1 (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Source

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Note well that Forbes was still reliable in the 1980s, went down in reliability in the 1990s, and has only become deprecated in this millennium. The source used in this article was written by the subject himself, thus making it a primary source. It is possible that it was also paid-for. Just saying. Bearian (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply