Talk:Rhaetic

Reworked Article for Neutrality

Reworked article to give neutral view rather than the claim that Etruscan position is proven.

For "mainstream opinion" see current Encyclopedia Britannica online:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/489428/Raetian-language —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.199.131 (talk) 07:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Could use actual info on language

The article of course could use a table showing the phonology of Raetic, and a description of grammatical structure, with comparisons to Etruscan, Celtic, Venetic/Illyrian, Latin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.199.131 (talk) 08:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Spelling

Surely "Rhaetic" is the more conventional spelling. Deipnosophista (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Yup. — kwami (talk) 05:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Venetic alphabet

Why on earth does Venetic alphabet link to this article???!!! It has little to do with the subject. I'm about to change it to the Old Italic alphabet.--Pet'usek ^{[petrdothrubisatgmaildotcom]} 08:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Rhaetian language () listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rhaetian language (). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Rhaetic

Hi Berig, could you rename this article 'Rhaetic', which is the most common spelling? The article does use the form 'Rhaetic' but its name has not been changed yet. Thank you, regards Alcaios (talk) 06:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Done!--Berig (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Sampi

The letter for ts looks and sounds suspiciously similar to sampi, is it a coincidence? Getdincts (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2026 (UTC)