Talk:Qualcomm Snapdragon

	; Archives (Index) ;
	Talk:Qualcomm Snapdragon/Archive 1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

CorporateM (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

Qualcomm Snapdragon has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 13, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.xda-developers.com/qualcomm-camera-isp-snapdragon/

Article review

Latest comment: 1 month ago8 comments2 people in discussion

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of orange banners. There are also lots of short, one sentence paragraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm the one who caused most of said banners and one sentence paragraphs. Yes, I agree with a GAR.

The article seems to attract very little editors to the point where most additions i've seen among the 2 years of my watchlisting are updates on new product releases. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 06:10, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@IrisChronomia: Would you be interested in bringing this to GAR? You can probably explain the concerns moreo effectively than me. Z1720 (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Z1720 Surely. I'm on my mood right now so might have some delay before my post; rest assured I'll be there. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 16:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@IrisChronomia: Still interested in bringing this to GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for my procrastination, I struggle to write anything long enough for a thread.

I think the tl;dr is that the subject of this article is not notable to the level of significance that would warrant a GA-level of coverage - not enough RS cared about Snapdragon for us to cite. Most of the coverage on the subject are basically skin-deep product descriptions and in-depth technical / microarchitectual discussions are frequently about the underlying technologies instead of the product themselves, e.g., the CPU microarchitectures that Qualcomm purchased from ARM and pasted into their chips. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 03:06, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

*I'll probably just respond here with multiple comments and then copy-paste them to a new GAR thread. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 03:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I still remember this article, I just can't get myself to write on it. Everytime I try my personal bias and emotions against the company gets the better of me, and the impulse of writing down personal opinions drowns out every other thought.

So... I'm sorry, for not having the ability to write down my thoughts and bring this article to GAR noticeboard. I'll try, though. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 13:16, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply