Talk:Pterosauromorpha

Animals Low‑importance

Pterosauromorpha is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

redirect

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

@Trilletrollet: The issue is that what people who are searching for the term are most likely looking for the narrower focus Pterosaur and not likely the wider Avemetatarsalia. The "possible" inclusion of to non-Pterosauria clade taxa is controversial. I disagree.--Kev min § 00:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Kevmin: That's a good point, I suppose. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 00:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

With the discovery of Maehary that is no longer the case, so the change I made was actually correct. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 16:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ornithodira vs Avemetatarsalia

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Avemetatarsalia is the redirect. Might be worthwhile to change ornithodira to avemetatarsalia on this page. 2601:151:C000:29E6:4406:BC99:E979:DC93 (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, both Avemetatarsalia and Ornithodira are valid taxa. The Ornithodira page redirects to Avemetatarsalia because almost all avemetatarsalians are ornithodirans. HFoxii (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply