Talk:Pripyat
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Altenmann in topic Pripyat COA
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pripyat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 16 months |
Infobox name
[edit]Consensus on Chernobyl appears to be that the WP:COMMONNAME is displayed as the article name and used in the body, but the Ukrainian romanization is displayed in the infobox. Should this be also applied here? Coleisforeditor (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Bkell: I understand that you made an edit in 2017 that removed the name from the infobox,
{{ping}}ing you in case you're interested. Coleisforeditor (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)- I don't have a strong opinion here. I explained my motivation at the time at Talk:Pripyat/Archive 1#Consistency in spelling. I did not recognize that a distinction might be made between the spelling in the article text and the spelling in the infobox; if that's a common distinction made in other similar articles, then it seems reasonable to make that distinction here too. I do think that the spelling in the first sentence of the article text should match the spelling in the article title—that was probably my main motivation for my edit in 2017. —Bkell (talk) 01:35, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- The name parameter should match the page title. This was recently changed on the other article and I have undone this. Mellk (talk) 02:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Strange, I remember looking back and this change I believe has been in the other article since at least ~2017 (I cannot remember precisely, it was a few days ago, so take it with a grain of salt, but my point is it's been in effect for a while) Coleisforeditor (talk) 02:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- From what I can see, both names were included in the infobox but another editor decided to remove "Chernobyl" from the infobox and it defaulted to the other name. If we want to include "Prypiat" as an alternative name in this infobox, then sure, I don't see the issue with this. But it does not make sense to have one name that does not match the title. Mellk (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- WP:WHATEVER, in the case the consensus on Chernobyl is for whatever reason challenged then the proposal doesn't particularly hold much weight. Coleisforeditor (talk) 02:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- From what I can see, both names were included in the infobox but another editor decided to remove "Chernobyl" from the infobox and it defaulted to the other name. If we want to include "Prypiat" as an alternative name in this infobox, then sure, I don't see the issue with this. But it does not make sense to have one name that does not match the title. Mellk (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Strange, I remember looking back and this change I believe has been in the other article since at least ~2017 (I cannot remember precisely, it was a few days ago, so take it with a grain of salt, but my point is it's been in effect for a while) Coleisforeditor (talk) 02:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Only Prypiat
[edit]Why adding Russian translation as the main English translation? The name of Ukrainian town Prypiat should be only in Ukrainian-English translation. Russian one is completely redundant here. Check names of cities on Google maps, it's only Prypiat. Valentyn Holod (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Pripyat COA
[edit]It is fake. I nominated it for deletion in Commons:
- Pripyat never had COA. See post from National Museum "Chernobyl" here. It fact, it is a rendering of a souvenir badge, hence it is copyright violation.