Talk:Presentationism

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Epistemology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics
	Epistemology

~ism not really defined

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article seems to define "presentation" in a philosophical sense without really saying what the "-ism" is. Equinox (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Literal gibberish sentence?

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"According to G. F. Stout (cf. Manual of Psychology, i. 57), presentations are whatever constituents or our total experience at any moment directly determine the nature of the object as it is perceived or thought of at that moment." This seems ungrammatical. Equinox ◑ 14:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply