Talk:Potlatch ban

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Politics / History Mid‑importance

	Canada portal Canada notice board This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If it ain’t no other potlatch ban, I’m going to move this article. Sure, I know Canada is hardly a real country, but we can let it sit in the regular namespace, without being tagged, just like all the undisambiguated events that have happened in other places. —Soviet Canuckistan 19:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Point taken, I moved it. DS (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

name change/full capitalization required

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the real world it's almost always capitalized as Potlatch Ban, also referred to as the Anti-Potlatch Law...."wiki lowercase-ism" running amok changing spelling/capitalization conventions because MOS people don't have a grasp on reality and want to change it to their own preferences. Capitalize this; I'm not going to log in to do the move, but it has to be done......do I have to cite it to prove it? Read the references!58.8.198.33 (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC) (Skookum1)Reply

Just moved it. I agree wholeheartedly; MOS gets interpreted way wrong all the time; MOSFOLLOW overrules all of it, but that gets ignored all too often.Skookum1 (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply