Talk:Partial Euler Product

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 July 2026 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 12 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(

)

... that partial Euler products for elliptic curve L-functions contain an unexpected factor, leading to interesting connections to BSD, a millennium problem?

- Reviewed:
- Comment: The factor is the square root of 2, first appearing in Goldfeld's paper on the topic. Later, Conrad extended his work and explained that it comes from the second-moment L-Function.

Created by Dan Olegovich (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

[Not a full DYK review] the article has many valid cleanup banners that are blocking its appearance on DYK. But also, to meet the DYK requirement for being interesting, we need a hook with some real-world relevance, and avoidance of jargon. The Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture cannot be expected to be known by most readers, especially disguised by an acronym, the word "interesting" is an editorialization that needs a published source, and unless there is some reasonable expectation for this connection to be strong enough to be central in a $1M payout from the millenium prizes there is little real-world relevance. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply