Talk:Parallel compression
Add topicA fact from Parallel compression appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 March 2010. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge
[edit]I don't agree with merging this, as it would be useful to have a full technical description on the page like the one that appears in one of the references that was removed by a previous edit. 203.144.32.165 03:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Does parallell compression have any other effect, than reducing the ratio of the compressor used? 80.98.84.149 17:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Parallel compression doesn't reduce the RATIO of the compressor used, for starters. What it does is keeps a similar ratio while minimally impacting the sound quality. Quite a fun little trick, that. Fun for mastering. And no, we shouldn't merge it. We need someone who really knows their stuff in this regard to expand this into a tutorial, since it is a useful tool not likely to soon become a unified device.
The question above was mine. What I was thinking about:
If we add the dry signal:
To a compressor that looks like this:
File:Parallel compression 2.png
Wouldn't we get a compressor that looks like this?
File:Parallel compression 3.png
MyNameHasBeenTaken 13:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Parallel compression does not keep the same ratio - the combination of the direct path and the compressed path give generate a derived ratio (transfer characteristic) that is always less than that set on the compressor. I'd be willing to expand this article into something with a lot more detail.

