Talk:Nick Revell
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 months ago by ~2026-14888-13 in topic Pleonasm?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Pleonasm?
[edit]It is only a tiny suggestion but copy is written then edited by the sub editor. So asserting newspapers employ a 'prolix poorly edited writing style' is in reality purely a function of bad editing. Thus a 'poorly edited prolix writing style' may better describe the content. But I hasten to add that this is a tiny suggestion in no way asserting that the original writer did anything less than a great job. I only know the above because I come from a family of journalists so am keenly aware of the process. ~2026-14888-13 (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class University of Oxford articles
- Unknown-importance University of Oxford articles
- Stub-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
