Talk:Moss Bros Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article is certainly devoid of sources, but aren't publicly traded companies pretty much de facto notable? – ukexpat (talk) 15:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Moss Bros Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

2023 brand and logo change

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

New Editor, for transparency working with MOSS to ensure their Wiki page is factual and up-to-date. Minor edits made, around their rebrand (From Moss Bros). Need a new Logo adding as this one is incorrect.

Any support on getting this updated would be great, thanks. SteveRRCarroll (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

The current logo on the page is incorrect and outdated as of 2023 when MOSS Bros rebranded to MOSS:
Incorrect logo:
^[1]:

SteveRRCarroll (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

↑ https://brave.agency/knowledge-insights/brand-new-moss-blends-tradition-and-innovation-to-redefine-its-brand-identity/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Done Please refrain from making direct edits where you have a COI Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

[1] ttps://brave.agency/knowledge-insights/brand-new-moss-blends-tradition-and-innovation-to-redefine-its-brand-identity/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]