Talk:Missimia

The content of Missimia flavida was merged into Missimia on 2 August 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Beetles Low‑importance

	Insects portal Missimia is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Papua New Guinea Low‑importance

	New Guinea portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Proposed merge of Missimia flavida into Missimia

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA - Sources cited and taxonomic databases only give one species for the genus William Avery (talk) 14:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Support No other species in the genus per GBIF. The genus should remain as the article per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA which says that "the article (if there is no common name) should go under the scientific name of lowest rank, but no lower than the monotypic genus". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:40, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply