Talk:Mehmed II

Patronage of European Art

-- Suggested addition to Personal Life

Mehmed II had been exposed to European art and history from an early age, leading to his subsequent patronage of European artists later in life. As a boy, the young Sultan kept a sketchbook, in which he made a number of drawings in European style. His acquisition of Constantinople brought the growing empire into heavy, direct exposure to the Byzantine culture and legacy of trade and statecraft in the Mediterranean and presented him with an opportunity to indulge in his artistic interests. The Sultan’s first recorded commission of an Italian artist occurred in 1461, when he requested an artist to paint and sculpt from the Lord of Rimini, Sigismondo Malatesta.

More famous is his commission of Venetian artist Gentile Bellini to create a set of medals, and later a portrait in his likeness. Although not known as a medalist, Bellini also created a number of medals depicting the Sultan. One of the medallions designed by Bellini offers a profile of Mehmed on the front, ringed with the text “MAGNI SOULTANI MOHAMETI IMPERATORIS,” Of Great Sultan Mehmed, Emperor. On the reverse are three crowns in a stack, as well as the artist’s signature. Both the medals and the portrait created by Bellini would have communicated suitable titles for Mehmed II to a European audience; historian Antonia Cevizli mentions that it was likely that a Bellini medal was given to Lorenzo de’ Medici by the Ottoman envoy to Florence, and that the triple crown motif alluded to similar designs utilized by European powers, in this case representing Greece, Trebizond, and Asia, the three realms under Ottoman control. Cevizli also makes reference to the Venetian style of the Bellini portrait, aligning Mehmed II with previous doges and thereby providing a reference point for the Sultan in the minds of its viewers. The three crown motif is also present in this portrait.

Historian Julian Raby notes that in addition to these commissions, two sources suggest that the Sultan had also asked Bellini to produce erotica and an image of a Virgin and Child, which would supplement his existing collection of Christian relics and cultural artifacts. The influence of European art and culture was greatest in the Sultan’s private life, where he had the most contact with Byzantium and Europe; a different world from his public patronage of art and architecture, which took form in the mosques and fortresses of Istanbul.

References

Misinformation

The article Mehmed II states "Some sources claim that Mehmed had a passion for his hostage and favourite, Radu the Fair.Source 143."Whereas,another wikipedia article Franz Babringer contradicts this very information."As a result of his reputation, his magnum opus Mehmed the Conqueror was published without any accompanying notes on source material at all, since the companion volume outlining his extensive and voluminous sources was unfinished at the time of his death. As a result, Mehmed the Conqueror is one of the few academic works available with no cited sources and whose authority rests solely on the reputation of the author's research abilities. Prof. Halil Inalcik from the University of Ankara criticizes Babinger's overlook of Ottoman sources."The book doesnot seem reliable and could be misleading LahoreReader (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Moreover,Franz Babringer quoted it from Laonikos Chalkokondyles.The nature of this account is anti-Ottoman as another wikipedia article on Laonikos Chalkokondyle suggests:" his narrative on the rule of Mehmed II is generally antagonistic. Thus, it has been argued that Laonikos Chalkokondyles was writing for the contemporary western audience in the Turcica genre rather than for the post-Byzantine intellectuals associated with the Ottoman court." SOURCE:Akışık-Karakullukçu, Aslıhan (2019). "A question of audience: Laonikos Chalkokondyles' Hellenism". Byzantinische Zeitschrift. 112 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1515/bz-2019-0002. S2CID 193148946. LahoreReader (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2026

so when it says John Hunyadi it should actually be Janos not John. ~2026-33948-00 (talk) 01:04, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: The English version of his given name is being used here, which is consistent with Wikipedia's article about him. If you think this should be changed the place to discuss it would be Talk:John Hunyadi, but you'd have to demonstrate that he's most frequently referred to as "Janos" in reliable, English-language sources, per WP:COMMONNAME. Day Creature (talk) 01:19, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Mehmed's letter to his Father in 1446 is a myth

I didn't get an access to the source of the claim "According to the 17th century chronicles, Mehmet wrote to his father if you are sultan, come lead army, if I am Sultan, I order you to lead the army etc" but even when saying 'according to the 17th century articles', it's citation is a book from Erhan Afyoncu's titled Truvanın İntikamı but the source of the Halil İnalcık's statement that 'Fatih didn't convince his father, Çavdarlı Halil Pasha did' is also the mentioned book of Erhan Afyoncu. But there has never been a real recordings of said quote from Mehmet 2nd. ~2026-43049-69 (talk) 01:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Antivari

In the Ottoman-Venetian War (1463–1479) section it says Antivan instead of Antivari (modern-day Bar in Montenegro). ~2026-39912-33 (talk) 19:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)