Talk:Matilda Wallace

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 January 2025 by reviewer Reconrabbit (talk · contribs).

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Matilda Wallace is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Copyvios

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm seeing some likely copyvios in this:

The sentences from "until the turn of the century was largely one of increasing land degradation ...". Report.
The text about "the early days of sheep farming in Australia". Report.
Abraham's journey, the text around "from "Sturt's Meadows" with". Report.

Nothing too major, but it does need sorting, if anyone gets to it before I do. I agree with the "overly detailed" tag. There's an interesting article in here, but it's buried by too much detail, some opinion, and too many primary sources. Tacyarg (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply