Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Mark Pfeifle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notes

[edit]

For GOP, Urgency On Social Security —Preceding unsigned comment added by Munchdead (talkcontribs) 11:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry but this was super clearly written primarily by Mark Pfeifle.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.136.78.162 (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Pfeifle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

propose edits to the Mark Pfeifle, former deputy national security advisory, wikipedia page

[edit]


  • What I think should be changed (include citations):

I request that the following sentence be revised for neutrality and precision:

“In 2016, Pfeifle guided law enforcement communications strategy to discredit water protectors in the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. He would later advise law enforcement at Thacker Pass lithium mine.”

Proposed replacement:

“In 2016, Pfeifle and his firm, Off the Record Strategies, advised the National Sheriffs’ Association and law enforcement officials on communications during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests, including talking points, media outreach, and communications training.[1] DeSmog and ProPublica characterized the communications effort as an attempt to discredit Dakota Access Pipeline protesters.[2][3] Pfeifle later wrote in a Fargo Forum column that he worked with the National Sheriffs’ Association on strategy, media relations, and protecting law enforcement from doxing and disinformation during the protests.[4] In 2021, Pfeifle met with the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office in Nevada to discuss lessons learned from the Dakota Access Pipeline protests as officials prepared for possible demonstrations at the proposed Thacker Pass lithium mine; ProPublica reported that the department did not appear to have hired him.[5]

References

  1. Hiar, Corbin (July 20, 2017). "Emails Show Iraq War PR Alums Led Attempt to Discredit Dakota Access Protesters". DeSmog. Retrieved July 24, 2026.
  2. Hiar, Corbin (July 20, 2017). "Emails Show Iraq War PR Alums Led Attempt to Discredit Dakota Access Protesters". DeSmog. Retrieved July 24, 2026.
  3. Olalde, Mark (July 23, 2025). "'Under the Microscope': Activists Opposing a Nevada Lithium Mine Were Surveilled for Years, Records Show". ProPublica. Retrieved July 24, 2026.
  4. Pfeifle, Mark (May 9, 2026). "Guest Column: When the Strait tightens, North Dakota answers". InForum. Forum Communications. Retrieved July 24, 2026.
  5. Olalde, Mark (July 23, 2025). "'Under the Microscope': Activists Opposing a Nevada Lithium Mine Were Surveilled for Years, Records Show". ProPublica. Retrieved July 24, 2026.

 Preceding unsigned comment added by Wereotr (talkcontribs) 19:20, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 1-AUG-2026

[edit]

🔼  Clarification requested  

  1. Please indicate the reasons for making these changes.[1] Curiously, you had included reasons earlier but then deleted them. We need those back.
  2. When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the {{Edit COI}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=y to |ans=n.

References

  1. "Template:Edit COI". Wikipedia. 7 July 2019. Instructions for submitters — #6: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution. Be specific: "add X", "delete Y", "replace X with Y". If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.

Regards,  Spintendo  23:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply