Talk:Mark Casson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Economics Low‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too much detail?

Latest comment: 4 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! Wondering if there's too much detail in each section about Casson's theories... At this point, it looks like there's more info about his theories than there is about him. DessHolliday (talk) 18:44, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I agree - I think the theories should just each have a quick summary under one heading and link to external pages if needs be.

I'm not sure about the two warnings about non encyclopedic tone and subjective language as I'm not spotting anything obvious in what I'm reading. Egdums82 (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply