This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Overall: Articles are long enough. Agree that we can accept these as within the timeframe. Copyvio tool finds no issues. Not keen on "first" hooks, and noting that Guinness is not generally considered a reliable source, but given that we are emphasizing her official recognition rather than making the claim ourselves I think it's fine under WP:PRIMARY. Should be good to go. —Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:04, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Beejamjam, Launchballer, and Crisco 1492: Pulled this from queue. I'm seeing whole sentences that appear lifted from sources. For example, in TRUK, "transmasculine team [...] played against the Dulwich Hamlet F.C. Supporters Team, also at Champion Hill with 500 supporters watching." is highly similar to "... transmasculine team played against the Dulwich Hamlet FC Supporters Team. This match again took place at Champion Hill in London with over 500 supporters watching ..." from the source. There are several more in both articles, which makes me suspect even the phrases that aren't being highlighted in Earwig could be closely paraphrased. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 23:42, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, gosh. I was of the belief that I wasn't closely paraphrasing, and was perhaps overconfident that I could properly use the info in a new way, but clearly took my eye off the ball. I will be properly employing the note-taking strategy from now on, which I've previously used only patchily. I'll come around and fix it when I can. Beejamjam (talk) 00:03, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
On second thought, having had a look over both articles and checking for any close paraphrasing, I could only find very scant close aside from the quote mentioned, most of it falling (I believe) under WP:LIMITED. I'd of course encourage a third opinion on that front. For avoidance of doubt, I've rephrased a few sentences including the one quoted. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to get this reinstated for DYK, even though I did not nominate it myself. Beejamjam (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for getting started on those, Beejamjam. I'm still seeing pretty long phrases highlighted in the reports for Clark and TRUK, which show exact matches with the source, and comparing the other sources shows more matches. Keep in mind that there could be improper paraphrasing even in the unhighlighted sections which the tool can't detect. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Very nicely done, Launchballer! The articles continue to be long enough, neutral, and reliably sourced. No further copyright or text–source integrity issues turn up with some spot-checks. I'll defer to Crisco's review for the other aspects and restore the green checkmark: . —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 23:04, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply